Skip to main content

(I'm referring to it as 'Bundyville' because the inhabitants of the town of Bunkerville are kind of fed up with the whole situation.)

If it weren't for the guns and stated willingness to use them, I'd find the whole Cliven Bundy situation to be a parody of a Tea Party rally sans corporate sponsorship worthy of a Coen brothers script...the story of a relatively mundane grazing rights dispute involving off-center and unusual characters for whom the ending is not necessarily a happy one. Think Fargo with cattle and militiamen.

The temptation is there to laugh at these jokers camping out in Bundyville and the people who want to be at Ground Zero for the start of the Wingnut American Revolution. Or whatever their cause is:

Welfare negroes, the United Nations, sexually devious lawyers, satan, a Chinese solar farm, microchips0, secret-agent NPS, a Muslim-Kenyan president, hippies, illegals. Take your pick.
Pretty much any movement of note - left- or right-flavored - will attract people who are out on what is generally considered to be the ideological fringe, whether they're retirees wearing tricorn hats, militia enthusiasts, or Venusians...and we mock and marginalize them because, well, they are for the most part mock-worthy. In doing so, however, we make it easy to dismiss whatever these out-there people are saying that might actually make a little sense.1

At the very least, I appreciate the fringe because that's where the most of the passion and willingness to shake up the status quo comes from. The malcontents may not run things, but they can on occasion change the conversation.

In a slight-but-important way, I can understand what's going on under all of what the Bundyvillians are doing; this protest/stand off has qualities reminiscent of the Populist movement of the 1890's, where groups of farmers united against what they considered to be monied interests in what for that time sounded like a rural Occupy movement.  

Not that I can put the racism, religious delusion, paranoia, and militant similarities of the Populist Movement or Bundyville aside:

The Populists had a tendency toward paranoia and overblown rhetoric. They considered Wall Street an enemy. Many Populists were hostile toward foreigners and saw sinister plots against liberty and opportunity. The party's 1892 platform described "a vast conspiracy against mankind has been organized on two continents and is rapidly taking possession of the world." After their crusade failed, the embittered Georgia Populist Tom Watson denounced Jews, Catholics, and African Americans with the same heated rhetoric he once reserved for "plutocrats."
What I find important about protest movements like the Tea Party2, Occupy, and whatever you want to call what's happening in Bundyville is that there's a strong populist, stick-it-to-The-Man spirit that should be giving the members of the bourgeoisie serious pause.

(continued below the fold)

We are probably due for having  - if we're not already in a weak one now - a populist movement rise up here in the U.S.; they have been occurring roughly every 30-40 years - 1880's, 1930's, 1960's, and now starting in the 00's. We get around five years or less of a progressive leap forward and then 20-30 years of conservative claw back on those gains. The timings are approximate; the period of U.S. prosperity from the late 1940's through the 1960's could be considered a residual effect of World War II, although it was also a time of anti-communist paranoia and severe racial tensions.

I would argue that we would have had a stronger progressive leap forward after the Great Recession if it weren't for the populist movement necessary to support it wouldn't have been quickly co-opted by the right-wing establishment. I mean, these leaps end rather quickly, but in Obamacare and the wishy-washy re-regulation of the financial industry, we didn't get the better solutions. That claw back came almost immediately this time, resulting in the implementation of poorer, more conservatively-oriented policy by a supposedly center-left administration.

You can see the similarities in what was said about the end of the era of the New Deal:

"A Democratic president’s economic agenda is a failure, lost to business class acquiescence, the embrace of austerity, and an overall lack of vision."

This was the conclusion of The New Republic, summarizing Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal in May 1940. Though there were “extraordinary accomplishments” to acknowledge, the magazine understood that the New Deal was a “failure in the central problem.” That central problem was the economic question, and there, the Roosevelt administration had “fail[ed] to discover or apply a genuine remedy for the stagnation of our economy and for unemployment.” Beyond the failure of vision, it “heeded business advice, at least in part, by trying to cut recovery expenditures” and engage in other forms of austerity.

Consider this: the "central problem [of] the economic question" wasn't addressed in the early years of the Obama administration or by the Tea Party faux-populists. Which is why we saw Occupy and are likely to see more Bundyvilles and calls for an active and focused leftist populist movement. They're outgrowths of the same dissatisfaction with the political and economic status quo, only with each having different targets for their ire.

The question for me is, what flavor of populist movement will we as a country have? Some variation on the New Deal or Great Society or a regression towards the anti-government, anti-regulatory stance held by the Bundyvillians? Or will it be some combination of the two?

...............footnotes, etc...............

0Why do microchips always seem to make an appearance? Is it the Biblical Mark of The Beast thing?
1I don't have a solution for that.
2the very early days, before it was co-opted by the establishment Right.
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (6+ / 0-)

    "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."

    by grape crush on Wed Apr 30, 2014 at 02:24:00 PM PDT

  •  Populism from either end of the spectrum (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Paragryne, Jon Sitzman, aimeehs

    makes me incredibly nervous. It is inherently divisive. We are seeing it from the extreme right here in the US and I lived it from the extreme left in South Africa.

    But the DKos community seems to view it differently than I do.

    Tell Warner Brothers Pictures that Rooney Mara is #NotYourTigerLily.

    by ExpatGirl on Wed Apr 30, 2014 at 02:38:14 PM PDT

    •  Not all of us. I'm right there with you. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
    •  Nervous... (0+ / 0-)

      I get that. There seems to be some sort of tipping point where we go from civil protest to brick-throwing (or firing weapons) and pogroms if the most, um, passionate participants in the movement gain enough power.

      But the DKos community seems to view it differently than I do.

      That's because they're not extremists. Not too many if any stone racists or eliminationists around here. When the goal of your populism is, say, single-payer healthcare - which many of the first world countries consider a no-brainer - instead of installment of a different system of government, populism isn't quite the dirty word we've been told it is.

      "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."

      by grape crush on Wed Apr 30, 2014 at 05:09:23 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  you can't compare left and right populists (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    We have nothing as delusional or threatening as the teabaggers. And, they had corporate astroturf money from the first hour of their formation.

    This Rover crossed over.. Willie Nelson, written by Dorothy Fields

    by Karl Rover on Wed Apr 30, 2014 at 02:43:35 PM PDT

    •  Disagree (0+ / 0-)

      Populism in general is blurry, ideologically. The union workers of the 20's and 30's weren't pushing civil rights, and I remember in the earlier days of the OWS the brouhaha when some neo-nazis stated agreement with some of that movement's goals.

      I'm also of the opinion that, if you go far enough to the extremity of your political leaning, left or right, you come out the other side.

      ...they had corporate astroturf money from the first hour of their formation.

      Nope. The early-early hours are credited to Paulites disappointed by his 2008 campaign. But the AFP and CoC money came in very shortly after.

      "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."

      by grape crush on Wed Apr 30, 2014 at 05:24:10 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I agree entirely with this (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    grape crush, aimeehs, allie4fairness

    Populism must not be given to the right, and it's extremely important for the Community Rights movement to avoid even the appearance of a marriage of convenience with groups like Posse Comitatus, sovereign citizen and Oathkeepers like Richard Mack.

    Just because Mack says he supports home rule doesn't make him an ally of the people of Mora County or the organic farmers whose crops or water are being contaminated by fracking or GMOs.

    It does seem that a small but significant number of people are so fed up with oligarchy, but are so badly educated and unaware of the true cause of our economic, environmental and other issues, that they are ready for any demagogue who is able to speak to their hurt. Incredibly, I just met an Occupy supporter who considers Mack to be a credible model for "fighting back" and I'm working on making it clear to him that this is not where we want to go.

    The results of leaving populism to the right or nihilists of any ideology are tragic and the last couple of centuries of recent history should not be ignored.

  •  When Was Bundy's Last Press Conference? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    The last time he spoke he compared himself to Rosa Parks.
    Isn't the press covering him anymore?

    The right is comparing Bundy to Ghandi.  Whoa!

  •  Recced for… (0+ / 0-)

    …footnotes beginning with zero.

    It appeals to the computer geek residing within.

    LRod—UID 238035
    ZJX, ORD, ZAU retired
    My ATC site
    My Norm's Tools site

    by exatc on Wed Apr 30, 2014 at 05:38:11 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site