Skip to main content

Frank Bruni is troubled. He looks around and sees signs of America's decline -- Education, our economy, our trains, bridges and tunnels, our own expectations.  And Frank relies on impeccable sources like Maureen Dowd, who sees the President's "truculent passivity" as part of a new "fatalism."  Why even "Democratic strategists" comment on this!

Bruni's column suffers from an acute but typical case of Beltway Emperor's-New-Clothesism. He looks around, scratching his head, and can't figure out why the heck this is happening.  Why the pessimism?  Why the stagnation?  What could it possibly be?

Bruni et al. cannot see the blatant nakedness of one party losing its mind.  Of 35 years of that party rejecting the New Deal consensus, and doing everything possible to create the pessimism of which Bruni despairs.  We can look in vain at Bruni's column for any mention of Republican sabotage and war against the poor and middle class.

Bruni et al. cannot remember that affirmative tax and spending policies of Reagan and the Bush's caused the shrinking of the American dream the Bruni bemoans.

Bruni et al. cannot see that the ACA is the most obvious factor in starting to reverse pessimism and despair.  They cannot see that half of the states are standing in the way of their people getting this route out of medical and financial despair.

Bruni et al. cannot see, as they fret about bridges and tunnels and trains, how Republicans are killing these projects, like Christie and the ARC Tunnel (a bigger scandal when he did it in 2010 than anything that's been revealed since, including the GWB)

Bruni et al. cannot admit that they played (and are still playing) a key part in the process they lament.  They choose not to remember or repent from their behavior in 2000 that helped put W Bush in the White House:

In his 2001 campaign book, Ambling Through History, Bruni described the first presidential debate between Bush and Gore as a dispiriting debacle for Bush. He wrote:
By any objective analysis, Bush was at best mediocre in the first debate, in Boston. … in all of [the debates], he was vague. A stutter sometimes crept into his voice. An eerie blankness occasionally spread across his features. He made a few ridiculous statements. … I remember watching the first debate from one of the seats inside the auditorium and thinking that Bush was in the process of losing the presidency.
Funny, but the guy who covered that very same debate for The New York Times—a fellow by the name of “Frank Bruni”—wrote it up rather differently. Nothing at all appeared in his coverage about Bush’s “ridiculous statements.” Instead, Times readers got the following:
It was not enough for Vice President Al Gore to venture a crisp pronunciation of Milosevic, as in Slobodan, the Yugoslav president who refuses to be pried from power. … Mr. Gore had to go a step further, volunteering the name of Mr. Milosevic’s challenger, Vojislav Kostunica. Then he had to go a step beyond that, noting that Serbia plus Montenegro equals Yugoslavia. … and as Mr. Gore loped effortlessly through the Balkans, barely able to suppress his self-satisfied grin, it became ever clearer that the point of all the thickets of consonants and proper nouns was not a geopolitical lesson. … it was more like oratorical intimidation, an unwavering effort to upstage and unnerve an opponent whose mind and mouth have never behaved in a similarly encyclopedic fashion.  
So Frank Bruni et al. (and you know who you are), spare me your lamentations about pessimism and shrinking America.  Recognize who is at fault, including your own role.  Write about issues -- about Republican governors' war against their own people by denying Medicaid expansion; about Republicans racist Voter ID laws (much worse in their effect than any spewing by a Sterling or Bundy); about the disgrace of killing unemployment insurance extension and cutting food stamps.

Otherwise, you're occupying useless space.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Bruni's column is a gem from the get-go. (5+ / 0-)

    It begins...

    "Not long ago, I asked a good friend of mine..."

    Hell, Frank, at least Tom Friedman hails a cab for his special brand of insight.

    Later, he opines, "We seldom build big things anymore."

    Ah, I guess the Freedom Tower and the various NASA Mars Rovers (we launched tiny things to Mars, and, somehow, they landed at the right destination and performed miraculously) are figments of my overactive imagination.

    Not to mention, of course, the advances in technology and medicine that should make our heads spin but that we take for granted every day.

    The punditocracy is as consistently enjoyable as a bout of strep throat.

    How about I believe in the unlucky ones?

    by BenderRodriguez on Sun May 04, 2014 at 12:27:42 PM PDT

  •  He's complaining we dont think or dream or do big? (3+ / 0-)

    When the R's have done everything they can for decades to ensure the only things built in America are ever bigger Xanadu's for a minuscule class of god-like overlords, and a ginormous military to defend them against the peasants in case they ever start to wonder why they cant have anything nice or get any help on nay level yet are supposed to be grateful for living here?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site