Skip to main content

I'm now a Californian, but grew up in St. Louis County, MO.  In 1964 my parents moved their primary residence to their weekend escape home in a rural county not far away.  They were Republicans, and until I "woke up" after reading the Pentagon Papers, I was, too.  But my first election was the 1968 presidential one.  Follow me below the fold….

I was a PoliSci major at MU, and had been a student of Robert Karsch.  Each election year he updated his "Government of Missouri" book with the returns from the last election; it was the text for the required course in citizenship at MU.  That becomes important in the context of what happened to me that first election.  My Dad had been elevated to Republican County Chairman upon joining the county committee, and he clearly had thoughts that I might pursue a career in politics.  In the furtherance of that goal, he stepped aside as chief election judge at the county courthouse at the last minute -- and then named me as his replacement.  It was, if you're following this story well, my first time as a voter!

Most of the judges -- well, all of them, really -- were OLD.  At least to a kid who's just become old enough to vote (21 in those days).  Part of the reason my Dad had been made County Chairman had to do with the fact that he was in his Fifties -- a "Young Republican" in the eyes of the rest of them!  So I assumed that many might not have been as aware as I of the state election laws.  In Missouri, it was clear that a vote on a paper ballot could not be counted unless two lines intersected within the box.  This made an "X" -- and check marks, single lines through the box, or any variation thereof was not acceptable, and was not to be counted. Having been Bob Karsch's student, I had this down cold.

And so I began to address my fellow judges on this point of Missouri election law.  Before I could get halfway through, the chief Democratic judge interrupted with a counter to what he thought was my point -- that we should adhere to the strict letter of the law.  But I calmly continued by saying that I agreed with him that every possible vote of our neighbors should be counted.  Further, I knew that in making every effort to discern a voter's intention and to count his or her ballot as best we were able, we would be technically breaking the election code we were deputized to enforce.  My proposal was simple:  ...that we all work in D/R teams to count the ballots, and that we take as broad a stance in interpretation as each pair of judges felt comfortable in taking.  …that if a recount were necessary, and we were found to be out-of-line in doing so, then at least we would have adhered to one standard, and had erred in favor of the voters' intents.

I heard no more from my Democratic counterpart, and the counting of seven separate paper ballots (including one each for planning and zoning regs, and for candidates to the county hospital board, as two examples) went smoothly and efficiently.  We completed our task in a timely manner and went home.  There was no recount, for there were no irregularities.

And so I'm perplexed at today's Republicans.  I know, I know.  But still, did they never take a citizenship class?  They're so enamored of quoting the Founding Fathers that they lose sight of the objective for which those men staged a revolution -- to found a democracy in which every person would have a voice in their government.  Voter fraud?  Aside from the ridiculous claims of massive violations, whatever case they make for laws having been broken misses the point of expanding that voice.  Oh, yeah.  Some law might have been broken, they say (never quite moving to show evidence of mass law-breaking…).  To which I can only quote Charles Dickens:

“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble,… “the law is a ass—a idiot. If that’s the eye of the law, the law is a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is that his eye may be opened by experience—by experience.”
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site