Skip to main content

By Mike Montgomery & Brian Purchia

We launched an Open Government working group for the State of California earlier this year – with our most recent roundtable at San Francisco-based accelerator Runway last week – to increase collaboration between government and the civic startup community.

This group will benefit people and communities through enhanced services utilizing open data. The benefits to the public, including transparency and reduction in lag time to inquiries are astounding as are the benefits to governmental offices, which include a decrease in paperwork and staff hours on public information requests, for example.

The idea we espouse sounds simple enough, in theory.  If government agencies and offices were to institute forward-looking open data policies statewide then the growing industry of civic-focused startups will grow exponentially. These civic entrepreneurs will create new products and platforms that will continue to increase government efficiency, while the reduction in costs to taxpayers will undoubtedly have a net-positive impact on society.  

One example is BuildingEye, a civic startup that has created a real-time map with all of the locations that have building permits in the cities in which BuildingEye operates. The San Francisco Entrepreneur in Residence company makes it easier for the public to see what is going to be built in your neighborhood with a click of button. Currently, though, BuildingEye only works in a handful of cities that have opened their data.

At our second open data roundtable hosted at San Francisco-based accelerator Runway last week, we charted a roadmap to bring new policies to unlock civic innovation. While the geographic boundaries of our goals are limited to city, county and state agencies within California, what we accomplish can be shared and borrowed by municipalities across the country as a blueprint for collaboration between tech, government and its inhabitants.

Our diverse working group includes government leaders, open data experts, and civic startup founders, including, but certainly not limited to the innovative minds behind Accela, Appallicious, Code For America, GovFresh, OpenCounter, OpenGov and PopVox.  These civic-minded innovators are coming together to help create more transparency, accountability, efficiency and economic development.

We’ve been lucky to count Kish Rajan, Director of the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, as an active member of the working group.  Rajan has been willing to engage in the important conversations necessary to drive an open gov platform which, he argues, will undoubtedly lead to vast economic development and the creation of an industry in its most infant stage.  

Rajan discussed strategies for implementing open data policies on the state level. He talked about how there is the potential for significant job creation when government agencies make their data more accessible. He also spoke about the importance of creating better, richer data systems and tools with open data that policymakers could use to make more informed decisions, which ultimately benefits constituents. But, he stressed the need for Californians to “re-envision” what economic development looks like, both at the state and local level, so that products and programs work from one city to another.  

Rajan unveiled the term “21st Century Economic Development”.  Here’s Rajan on what that means:  

Kish Rajan on 21st Century Economic Development from Mike on Vimeo.

The group also discussed ways of getting cities throughout the state to start opening up their data at the local level. Jay Nath, San Francisco’s Chief Innovation Officer said, “All over the country in small towns and big cities, not just in California, we are seeing the success of open data policies and programs. You don’t have to have Silicon Valley in your backyard to build a civic startup industry. What we’ve done in San Francisco can be replicated anywhere in the country, at any level of government. It’s just a matter of opening up the data.”

Nath makes the strong case that open data policies can enhance cities and counties everywhere as long as policymakers embrace theory of better serving their constituents through new methods, such as tech and innovation.  

One participant asked if an obstacle might be the common misconception that many small cities in rural parts of the state don’t think they have the ability, know-how, or enough tech entrepreneurs to create robust open data policies to benefit residents.

This simply isn’t the case, and many pointed to Manor, Texas, a small city of 6,000 people outside Austin.  Manor’s CIO, Dustin Haisler, implemented innovative projects all over the city including a QR-code program that allowed people to get info on city buildings and tourist spots.  Manor also partnered with Stanford University’s Persuasive Technology Lab to create a citizen idea portal where the public could suggest ideas, vote on policy and earn rewards.  They were also one of the first cities to partner with SeeClixFix to help residents easily report potholes and other issues needing attention.

Dustin Haisler
As Haisler has said, if Manor, Texas could pull this off, there’s no reason the civic tech industry in California can’t convince cities and towns all across the state to embrace the power and the business opportunity that civic innovation and a open government policy will bring.

Tim Woodbury, the head of Government Affairs for Accela, a civic tech company that works with hundreds of cities and agencies reinforced that cities want to get started, but don’t know how. “Every day, I hear from city officials that want to be part of this open data economy to bring new tools to help build a better community and a more effective government. But, many don’t know where to begin. Free open data platforms, like CivicData.com, are critical components. And open data policies can fuel the creation of whole new local industries.”

Another big issue that the group discussed was Proposition 42, an upcoming initiative on the California June ballot. Prop 42 could be the foundation for statewide open data policies. The measure establishes open government and transparency laws as core responsibilities at every level of government, not just the state. This means that if Prop 42 passes, every city in the State of California will be required to give their citizens access to public records, for free.

"Proposition 42 is a unique opportunity to increase access to government data across California and support civic innovation,” said Robb Korinke of GrassrootsLab. “I’m very excited to link the work of this group to our efforts at California Forward and expand the capacity of civic start-ups to transform governance in our State."

While there is still a lot of work to do in order to bring civic innovation and open government policies to every city in California, we are well on our way. The working group is made of up the best and brightest in the government technology industry. We’ll be meeting frequently in the coming months to figure out other ways to promote open data policies and programs all across the state, and at every level of government.

With continued forward momentum, the open gov movement will be coming to a municipality near you soon.  

Mike Montgomery is executive director of CALinnovates.
Brian Purchia is a new media communications strategist and owner of Purchia Communications.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Garrett, Meteor Blades, grubber

    www.calinnovates.org @CALinnovates

    by CALinnovates on Thu May 08, 2014 at 11:28:15 AM PDT

  •  Lots of potential here (0+ / 0-)

    I would quibble with using Manor as proof that rural communities are tech savvy enough, as Manor is 14 miles from the middle of Austin and an even easier commute to a lot of the North Austin tech companies. Probably a lot more residents make their mortgage payment from tech than ag.

    "It's the (expletive) 21st century man. Get over it." - David Ortiz

    by grubber on Thu May 08, 2014 at 12:10:52 PM PDT

    •  Manor, TX (0+ / 0-)

      Point well-taken, Grubber, though one the cool thing about Manor is that it was innovative ahead of its time, which had a great impact on its people.  It's a cool story and, while in Austin's back yard, certainly isn't Austin by any means, which is one of the great tech cities in America.  Open data can be beneficial to cities large and small no matter where they're located or what their access to tech centers might be.  It's a real opportunity for civic advancement.

      www.calinnovates.org @CALinnovates

      by CALinnovates on Tue May 13, 2014 at 03:47:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Are these for-profit or non-profit? (0+ / 0-)

    We have it within our power to make the world over again ~ Thomas Paine

    by occupystephanie on Thu May 08, 2014 at 01:37:28 PM PDT

    •  Steph (0+ / 0-)

      These can be for and non.  It's the beauty of the "industry" is that it welcomes all comers and the benefits flow to the people, ultimately.

      www.calinnovates.org @CALinnovates

      by CALinnovates on Tue May 13, 2014 at 03:43:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site