Skip to main content

There are tragedies and then there are scandals. The killings of four Americans in Benghazi, as investigations by the State Department and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence have already confirmed, was a tragedy, and likely a preventable one. But the Bush administration's regime of detainee torture was both a tragedy and a scandal. The use of so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, wasn't just a violation of U.S. and international law and a perversion of American values. Torture committed in the name of the United States is a national disgrace and a permanent stain that cannot be erased. And still there has been no accountability for those who ordered it, those who justified it and those who carried it out.

Which is why Republicans and their conservative amen corner now so cynically exploiting the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi must immediately join the call for declassification and public release of the Senate torture report as soon as possible.

In April, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted 11-3 to release its 6,300-page report on the uses and abuses of torture by the Central Intelligence Agency. With the support of Republicans John McCain (R-AZ), Susan Collins (R-ME) and Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), committee Chair Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has urged the White House to make public a declassified version of their findings that was four years and $40 million in the making. Unfortunately, McClatchy reported this week, that requested deadline of 30 days will be missed badly:

The procedure, however, likely will take months, several experts said. That's because it's complex and time-consuming. Not only does the CIA have to review information that came from its archives, but other U.S. intelligence agencies as well as the Pentagon and the State Department have to evaluate material that they provided, they said.
For their part, the regurgitators of right-wing talking points like Rich Lowry ("The Benghazi Deniers") should have no issue with the torture findings being made known to the American public. Why should they "mock, stall and disrupt" when President Bush and Vice President Cheney boasted about waterboarding Al Qaeda prisoners, when torture architect James Mitchell recently claimed "it was not illegal based on the law at the time," when torture memo author Jay Bybee is now a federal judge and when former chief of CIA clandestine services Jose Rodriguez brags about having destroyed dozens of interrogation video tapes?  Surely conservatives like Lowry (who praised Rodriguez for offering "a robust and persuasive defense of the enhanced-interrogation program") and Mona Charen ("I think he deserves a medal") have nothing to fear.

Especially when they accuse Democrats criticizing the House Republican show trial on Benghazi as claiming "there's nothing to see here." And especially when their doyenne Peggy Noonan in the spring of 2009 declared that torture—and the Bush administration legal documents justifying its use—should be neither seen nor heard:

"Sometimes in life you want to just keep walking. Sometimes, I think, just keep walking.... Some of life just has to be mysterious."
To do anything else, the Wall Street Journal, Powerline and what seemed like the entire right-wing echo chamber chanted in unison in 2009, would be to "criminalize conservatism."

Until the Senate CIA report sees the light of day, the Bush administration's torture program will remain a tragedy and a scandal. Meanwhile, thanks to the same Republican Party, the tragedy of Benghazi has become a farce.

Originally posted to Jon Perr on Fri May 09, 2014 at 12:48 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site