Skip to main content

Picture of nominee Michael Boggs with overlaid text describing his anti-choice, far-right conservative views.
Seven nominees to federal court posts answered questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday. But most of the attention was focused on Michael Boggs, a conservative Democrat whose views against abortion, against marriage equality and favoring the keeping of the Confederate battle flag as part of the state flag of Georgia when he was a state legislator have triggered strong opposition among liberal advocacy groups.

The nomination for a seat on the district court bench in Georgia "will go down in history as one of the worst acts of this president," said the chief foe of Boggs, Rep. David Scott, a moderate Democrat who represents the Atlanta suburbs.

Nominating Boggs, who has the backing of Georgia's two Republican U.S. senators, was part of a deal President Obama made to keep them from using the "blue slip" process to block any nominations to the more important circuit court bench.

Although the hearing, chaired by Democratic Sen. Dick Blumenthal, never got heated in its questioning of Boggs, the concerns of several Democrats on the committee were made obvious from the beginning. Both Al Franken of Minnesota and Dianne Feinstein of California hinted without ever saying outright that they had issues with the nominee's integrity.

Given the firebombing of clinics and the assassinations of abortion doctors, they, and others on the committee, including Blumenthal, found it hard to believe that Boggs could have been unaware of the risk involved in an amendment to a state law that would have required publishing the names of abortion providers. Yet, that is what he repeatedly claimed during the hearing. He also said repeatedly that he regretted his vote and now believes the amendment would have increased the risk to doctors.

Blumenthal said, "I find, frankly, incredible the idea that you would not understand that this would put doctors at risk."

Before you go below the fold for more on the committee's questioning, Please sign and send the petition: Reject Michael Boggs’s nomination to the U.S. District Court in Georgia.

Georgia state flag 1956-2001
Georgia state flag 1956-2001
Franken indicated that he had trouble with inconsistencies with what Boggs had told him in a private meeting about the reasons for voting in the legislature to keep the Rebel battle flag as part of the Georgia state flag. In 1956, the state added the battle flag as a racist nose-thumbing over federal desegregation efforts, including the school desegregation mandated by the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision. That flag became a renewed focus of opposition in the 1990s, eventually resolved by a referendum that selected a new flag, albeit one that echoes another Confederate flag, the "Stars and Bars."
Boggs' state house district was nearly 30 percent African-American when he twice voted for the Confederate flag.

When Boggs had met with Franken, the senator said, the nominee told him that he had voted for the amendment because his constituents wanted a referendum. But, Franken pointed out, Boggs had voted twice to keep the battle flag as part of the official state flag, and the first time a referendum wasn't at issue. The question that Franken edged up to but didn't ask: Were you lying about that?

As did other senators, Feinstein called into question whether Boggs could put aside his personal views in making rulings from the bench, particularly in matters of reproductive rights and marriage equality. He said he could put aside those personal views, and that this was proved by the 14,000 decisions he had made as a trial judge and hundreds as a state appellate court judge. He said he was fully on board with stare decisis, the legal doctrine of adherence to court rulings made in previous cases.

Feinstein said she hoped he would follow stare decisis, but implied she had been burned by a couple of Supreme Court nominees who made the same assertions at their nomination hearings but did not behave that way once they got on the court. Feinstein concluded, saying: "I want you to know that for my vote I have to have certainty. I don’t know quite how to get it in view of this record." Boggs again reiterated what he said was his record of sticking to precedent in his previous rulings.

And he did so again when Amy Klobuchar, the other Democratic senator from Minnesota, asked whether he considered Griswold v. Connecticut settled law. That 49-year-old ruling invalidated on the grounds of privacy a state law barring married couples from obtaining contraceptives. Some anti-abortion fanatics would like to see Griswold overturned. Boggs said he did consider it and Roe v. Wade settled.

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Tue May 13, 2014 at 11:25 AM PDT.

Also republished by Kos Georgia and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site