Skip to main content

Senator Mark Udall (D-CO) talks to the media after former CIA Director David Petraeus testified at a Senate Intelligence Committee closed hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, November 16, 2012. Petraeus testified Friday on Capitol Hill about the attack
Sen. Mark Udall

Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Mark Udall (D-CO) are questioning whether the Justice Department misled the Supreme Court in arguments in 2012 in a case the court dismissed, Clapper v. Amnesty International.
In the Clapper case, a group of plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. It permits the N.S.A. to intercept Americans’ international emails and phone calls on the domestic network and without a warrant as long as the target of the surveillance is a noncitizen located abroad.

The Obama administration argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing because they could not prove their communications had been intercepted. The justices voted 5 to 4 to dismiss the case.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. recited two claims made by the government: The Justice Department must notify criminal defendants who faced evidence derived from such surveillance, and the N.S.A., to intercept the Americans’ communications without a warrant, must target their foreign contacts for surveillance. But both claims have come under scrutiny in the recent focus on N.S.A. activities.

We've since learned, however, that the Justice Department was not notifying defendants when warrantless surveillance of their communications resulted in a wiretap order used to gain evidence in their prosecution. Additionally, because of the Snowden revelations and the documents that have been declassified since, we know that the NSA has scanned Americans' overseas emails without warrants and saved those emails that contained any discussion of a surveillance target—even if that target wasn't the person contacted. That directly contradicts the understanding of the law included in the Supreme Court's majority opinion, which kind of does call into question whether the government told the court everything.

Wyden, Udall and Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) originally wrote to Justice last year to express their concerns over this discrepancy. The department responded to them in December that "it was appropriate not to tell the court about scanning Americans’ international emails and saving those that discussed targets, because that activity had been classified at the time and was not relevant to the legal question before the court." Wyden and Udall question that assertion in their new letter, and argue that whether or not the information was classified at the time, the government did not have the right to mislead the court.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Wed May 14, 2014 at 02:41 PM PDT.

Also republished by Colorado COmmunity, Koscadia, PDX Metro, and Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site