Skip to main content

Graphic displaying potential for an internet after a pay-for-play net neutrality rule.

Federal Communciations Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler will be heading to Capitol Hill Tuesday to testify as sole witness at the hearing called by the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Communications and Technology. Republicans will all adopt the position of their leadership, that the FCC should keep regulatory hands entirely off of the internet, arguing that the "full job-creating potential of the private sector, including the Internet" depends upon the complete absence of the federal government.

Democrats, on the other hand, are likely to blast the new rules on which the FCC last week voted to move forward as the beginning of the end of a free and open internet. Consensus is building among Democrats that the FCC will need to act decisively to preserve net neutrality, and that doing so will mean reclassifying broadband companies as public utilities, so that their jurisdiction to regulate the internet will be clearly and legally established. They got an ally in that argument from Tim Wu, the guy who came up with the whole concept of net neutrality. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Wu provides a simple analogy to make  his argument: "Broadband is a utility and ought to be treated as such by the Federal Communications Commission."

Imagine that a private company owned the only bridge into Manhattan over the Hudson River. It isn't hard to see how that would put the owner in a position to extract cash from the rest of the economy, almost like a tax. Another, more subtle effect is the favoring of some businesses over others, distorting competition and innovation in other parts of the economy.

Broadband operators today own the effective bridges to the American home, and they have shown an inclination to use that power. Recently, they have induced direct competitors such as Netflix to agree to pay fees to ensure smoother streaming of content to customers, pegging the payments as "contributions" to their networks.

Classifying broadband as a "common carrier" under the 1934 Telecommunication Act would allow the FCC to use the full extent of its authority to prevent broadband providers from extracting tolls that damage the broader economy. It also would allow the FCC to reinstate the "net neutrality" rules that courts have recently struck down.

That reclassification wouldn't have to mean heavy-handed regulation from the FCC, Wu argues, but rather the opportunity to have "open internet" rules that "prevent broadband providers from blocking or discriminating against certain types of content," but still give broadband the room to make very healthy profits.

Convincing a Republican congress that regulation and profits can go together will be an uphill battle, as Tuesday's hearing will likely prove. That means the FCC is going to have to act to make sure the internet doesn't turn into Chris Christie's George Washington Bridge.

Please sign our petition to the FCC to keep a free and open internet.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Mon May 19, 2014 at 11:52 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site