Skip to main content

Show up at the polls not because you are enthusiastic, not because your choices are perfect, not because nobody has disappointed you, but because only by persistent political pressure from below will things change, and only by determining who wins in November can we avoid certain outcomes.

We're emotional creatures.  Question is, how do we channel that emotion?  How do we make decisions based on it?

One way to do it, the way that is often seen as most honest, is to just let yourself be washed along on the tides of your enthusiasms and your lack of same. We've let that guide our behavior on elections, so we get these sort of teeter-totter effects, showing up for certain elections, especially presidential ones, while our more conservative counterparts take up the complementary rhythm of the midterms.

Because of that, we swung all the way from having a Democratic Congress and White House to having those dumbass sons of bitches sitting on the House of Representatives.  Can't say the consequences of that have been pleasant.  How the hell, though, do we avoid such outcomes when we let ourselves be the mayflies of our moods, when we let all the disappointments and disillusionments plant our asses at home?

We don't.  But then what happens?  Well, the public or the politicians get the idea that the whole surge of Liberalism and progressivism were flashes in the pan, deviations from the norm.  And in a certain respect, they'd be right.

In another respect, though, they'd be wrong.  The Republicans are no more immune to the cycles of political shifts than we are.  They won big in 2010, lost in 2012.  They also lost in the 2006 midterms.  Shouldn't they have done better?  Of course they should have, if you treat this cyclical idea as if its some sort of deterministic principle of nature, rather than a result of current habits.

The big trouble for us is this bad habit of staying home.  It's a habit our counterparts have only rarely indulged in recent times, with the apocalyptic frenzy spewing out of the mouths of their pundits, panicking them to go to the polls.

Given all the consequences for having Republicans in charge, and the way I would say the results are demonstrably worse, demonstrably corrupting for our party, I would think we would look at our situation and say to ourselves, you know what?  Whether I like the candidates or not, I'm going to find the one who comes closest to what I want, who gets me where I need to go, and I'm going to put them in place.

Yes, there might be more overlap between their policies and the Republican policies than what I'd like.  That, though, will decline the more it becomes clear that the politicians have nothing to gain from straddling the fence.  We can't push the nation left the way we need to, if every midterm we stay home while the old folks show up.

We need to create a consistent condition of our presence, and make sure our leaders in Washington know we're going to show up.

They're not going to acknowledge absent voters.  They're not going to be afraid of those who don't show up.  They will seek out those who do.

This is a matter of concentration, really  The greater the percentage of liberals and progressives at the polls, the more liberal and progressive candidates will win, the more candidates will seek to please liberal and progressive voters, and support our platforms.

We have plenty of motivating factors we can channel into this encouragement to show up.  God knows we don't lack for bad consequences of having Republicans in charge of the House.  That doesn't end until there are more Democratic voters showing up at the polls in key districts than Republicans.

Let's stop waiting for events to get so bad that our presence is almost compelled.  Let's show up because we deliberately want to shift the nature of the electorate.  As far as other voters go?  Stop conceding arguments to the Right, stop conceding ground to them.  Stop resigning yourself to corpocracy, or all that other crap.

Start making the deliberate decision now to change things.  It's the attitude that informs the return of Republican midterm voters. Why don't we copy their persistence, so we can turn the tide against it?  If those who vote for Democrats in Presidential elections show up, we win.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Jon Sitzman, Fabienne
  •  Wonderful sentiment, great diary. (0+ / 0-)

    I fear the issue is even worse than mayfly participation; there is deliberate lack of participation by some.  My intent is not to impugn those folks; to my best knowledge they consider themselves to be voting (or not) their conscience.  But I agree with you, Stephen, that the consequences may be catastrophic for all.

    There's been plenty of discussion around this issue even this early on, and as November approaches there will surely be more.  I can only hope that people who think similarly to you and I can join hands and words and try to sway those who might choose not to vote at all if the most progressive candidate doesn't wind up being on the ballot.

    This is not as bad as it gets.  More Republicans in office = worse, categorically.  Our fight is to stop that.

    Not all people are human; not all humans are people.

    by Jon Sitzman on Wed May 21, 2014 at 01:46:38 PM PDT

  •  speaking theoretically then... (0+ / 0-)

    if it were somehow possible for the Socialist Workers Party to get enough votes to win, this could be a call to vote SWP, since the goal is to make sure Republicans don't get into office.

    Dear NSA: I am only joking.

    by Shahryar on Wed May 21, 2014 at 02:06:58 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site