Skip to main content

Eh, what's the worst that could happen?

It seems like this ought to have been a settled issue since the days after Love Canal: No, companies should not be allowed to put whatever chemicals they like in whatever proportions they like into our groundwater while invoking the sacred corporate doctrine of sucks to be you. How is this even up for discussion? And it's not even just up for discussion, the elected governments of various states have been going to the mat for the right not only to put whatever chemicals they like into the groundwater, but to make it illegal for anyone else to mention what those chemicals might be.

North Carolina lawmakers have softened a controversial bill that would have made it a felony to disclose the chemicals used in fracking. Under the version of the law that passed the state legislature on Thursday, the offense has been knocked down [from a felony] to a misdemeanor.
Oh, good, only a misdemeanor. That's good news, because we wouldn't want the doctor who tests you for chemical exposure to face time in the pokey if he shows you the lab results. We had to have the well tested here when we bought our house—it was a requirement of the escrow—and I hate to think I'd be sending the poor guy who tested it to the chair. Or would have gotten the chair only if he was honest about the results? The whole thing is more than a bit muddled.
Following widespread public outcry, lawmakers have reduced the penalty to community service.
I wonder if it'd be community service spent cleaning up fracking chemicals. It'd still be more than many of the fracking companies have been obliged to do.
But they failed to clarify confusing language from an earlier draft that might subject fire chiefs and health care providers to criminal charges. This provision could prevent emergency responders from speaking about their experiences with chemical accidents to colleagues—even when the information is relevant to emergency planning or patient care.
Which is about the greatest eff-you to constituents that the Republicans of North Carolina or any other state have ever devised: It's a crime for health officials to plan disaster response or patient treatment based on the chemicals you or they might be exposed to because energy company profits are specifically and legislatively more important, you piffling pile of nobody. The doctors and emergency responders are literally not allowed to know, and if they do know they're literally not allowed to say. That has to be an even bigger eff-you than Republican legislation requiring state agencies to ignore rising sea levels even if they know they're coming. It's gloriously, shamelessly crooked. It's like shooting someone and then filing charges against him for stealing your bullet.

Again, why is this a debatable issue? This wasn't settled 30 years ago, back in the heady days when we finally figured out that putting chemicals into the groundwater had the uncanny effect of putting chemicals in the groundwater? If these new batches of unknown stuff come back out in someone's well, the official North Carolina stance is that nobody is allowed to even bring it up?

Originally posted to Hunter on Mon Jun 02, 2014 at 02:47 PM PDT.

Also republished by North Carolina BLUE and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site