Skip to main content

Promotional image, Sarah Palin endorsing Joni Ernst.
Yeah, that's a thing.
What is that feeling? Deja vu? Just like 2012, conservatives are doing everything in their power to take what should be an overwhelmingly advantageous map, and giving Democrats every chance to survive.

In 2012, Republicans took a map almost as good as this year's and ended up losing two seats. Democrats are unlikely to repeat that miracle this year, particularly with mid-term liberal base turnout, but losing the Senate? Not if Republicans have anything to say about it!

Last night Republicans took one Democratic-held seat off the table, and put one of their own in play.

Iowa polling has shown Republicans within striking distance, trailing Democratic nominee Rep. Bruce Braley anywhere between three and 13 points (depending on who you believe). But if they really wanted to compete, they wouldn't have nominated someone to the right of Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock: Joni Ernst.

The state senator, who repeatedly described herself on the trail as a “mother, soldier, and a conservative,” zigged to the right in order to appeal to primary voters, pledging to abolish the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency. While Ernst received attention for calling the shootings in Santa Barbara, California, an “unfortunate accident” in a recent debate, she may have done more damage by opposing the Farm Bill and attacking the Clean Water Act in an agricultural state. Further, Ernst has shown herself to be prone to gaffes, including insisting to the Des Moines Register that Saddam Hussein actually possessed WMDs prior to the Iraq War.
There's more, including calling for the privatization of Social Security. But of all her assorted craziness, none is likely more damaging than her opposition of the farm bill. In Iowa. The Tea Party crowd is excited they got their new Sarah Palin. But this isn't Alaska.

Then there's Mississippi, which shouldn't even be in the same universe of any competitive Senate race. It is Mississippi, after all. Yet ultra conservatives have gone after an ultra conservative for not being ultra conservative enough, and the end result is carnage. More below the fold.

Incumbent Republican Sen. Thad Cochran would win re-election in a cakewalk. But a safe, if uninspiring incumbent apparently offends Tea Party sensibilities, and they enthusiastically supported the challenge from state Sen. Chris McDaniel. And last night, the best of all worlds (for Democrats) happened: Not only did McDaniels win, but he failed to hit the 50 percent threshold to avoid a runoff. So they get to spend the next three weeks beating the shit out of each other, and spending tons of money doing so.

Odds are that McDaniels wins the runoff. Not only are his supporters more motivated in what should be an insanely low-turnout election, but Democrats can't vote in the runoff, and Cochran's campaign worked to get Democrats to support him in the closing week of the race. Even if only a handful turned out for him in the end, they might've been the only reason Cochran avoided outright defeat. But again, that does him no good in the runoff.

So what does that mean for our chances in the general? It means that conservadem and former Rep. Travis Childers has a fighting chance. How much? Who knows? Polling has been scarce. A PPP poll last November had Childers trailing by just 41-38. A Rasmussen poll in March had McDaniels leading 47-35 (but it's Ras, so, you know...). On the other hand, the obvious parallel is Indiana's Senate race in 2012, where the teabaggers knocked off incumbent Sen. Dick Lugar and turned a safe seat into what eventually became a Democratic pickup. Mississippi would be a long-shot during the best of circumstances, but the more Republicans have to defend, the better it is for Democrats everywhere else. A McDaniels victory and runoff now means Republicans have to sweat Mississippi, and that's something they certainly didn't need at this time.

Update: Nice:

Within the past two weeks, private Democratic polling has shown that the party’s nominee, former Rep. Travis Childers, would start a general election statistically tied with McDaniel. A race against Cochran, who is well-liked by independents and many Democrats, would be difficult to the point of futility.
"Statistically tied" is party code for "behind, but within the MoE." Republicans are not liking this one bit.

Originally posted to kos on Wed Jun 04, 2014 at 09:14 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site