Skip to main content

Once upon a time....
The first commandment for rightwing columnists is that Thou Shalt Have No Shame. Ian Reifowitz's excellent diary shows that David Brooks follows that rule, with Brooks idiotically claiming that the big mistake in Iraq was Pres. Obama's withdrawal of US troops, not the war in in the first place.  

Jonah Goldberg is another conservative writer who has never deviated from that fundamental requirement, and he is not about to start. Goldberg's ignorant and dangerous warmongering in 2002 and 2003 was exposed for what it was at the time by Juan Cole.  But here we are, over a decade later, with that war having caused untold suffering and so many deaths, and Goldberg is again spewing forth on Iraq.  What does he want? A "time machine".  

Given that Goldberg eventually admitted that the war was a mistake, if he had a shred of decency he would obviously use a time machine to go back and retract his support for the war:

The Iraq war was a mistake.

I know, I know. But I've never said it before. And I don't enjoy saying it now.

But of course Goldberg has neither honor nor decency.  No, he wants a time machine so that President Obama could go back a couple of years and change his policies:
A better option would be a time machine. That way today’s President Obama could go back and give first-term Obama the benefit of his experience. He could tell him that foreign policy should define his talking points, not the other way around. .... Or maybe he would have kept U.S. troops in Iraq to deter the rise of ISIS.
Goldberg concludes with this conservative prescription:
Defenders of the president often ask critics, “Well, what do you want to do?” I’ll be honest. I don’t know. We have no good options left. I certainly think we should provide assistance to the (corrupt and pathetic) Iraqi government to repel ISIS. (Obama turned down their requests for air support last month.) But I certainly don’t want boots on the ground.

What I want is that time machine.

Well, I can't give you a machine in which you might transport Obama back a few years, but I can take us back to 2005 when Goldberg wrote this:
Since he [Juan Cole] doesn’t want to debate anything except his own brilliance, let’s make a bet. I predict that Iraq won’t have a civil war, that it will have a viable constitution, and that a majority of Iraqis and Americans will, in two years time, agree that the war was worth it. I’ll bet $1,000 (which I can hardly spare right now). This way neither of us can hide behind clever word play or CV reading. .... Money where your mouth is, doc.
Let's also go revisit what Cole wrote in 2005:
Jonah Goldberg knows absolutely nothing about Iraq. I wonder if he has even ever read a single book on Iraq, much less written one. He knows no Arabic. He has never lived in an Arab country. He can’t read Iraqi newspapers or those of Iraq’s neighbors. He knows nothing whatsoever about Shiite Islam, the branch of the religion to which a majority of Iraqis adheres. Why should we pretend that Jonah Goldberg’s opinion on the significance and nature of the elections in Iraq last Sunday matters? It does not.
Jonah Goldberg is a fearmonger, a warmonger, and a demagogue. And besides, he was just plain wrong about one of the more important foreign policy issues to face the United States in the past half-century. It is shameful that he dares show his face in public, much less continuing to pontificate about his profound knowledge of just what Iraq is like and what needs to be done about Iraq and the significance of events in Iraq.
There would be no need to even wish for a time machine if warmongers like Goldberg hadn't help push us into a war that we knew before it happened would be a disaster.
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site