Skip to main content

Colorado Sen. Mark Udall is going after his GOP opponent, Rep. Cory Gardner, in a new ad that documents Gardner's radically right-wing record on social policy.

Gardner is responding with a web video that claims Udall is teaming up with President Obama to lie about his record because he moderated his position after listening to voters. Specifically, says Gardner:

So, where’s what’s happening. Barack Obama’s ‘smart guys’ from Washington think they can come into Colorado to play politics. They’re attacking me for changing my mind about Personhood after I learned more and listened to more of you.
First, the ad Gardner is responding to comes from Udall, not Obama. Second, it's about more than just personhood. And finally, Gardner claims he's changed his mind on personhood, but he is still listed as a cosponsor of the federal personhood bill.

The fact is that Gardner hasn't really changed his mind on personhood—he's just come to realize that his position supporting it is unpopular in Colorado. So he's tried to muddy the waters by claiming to be against a state-level constitutional amendment on personhood while simultaneously supporting it nationally. His position makes no sense—the only explanation for him taking it is that he thinks voters in Colorado are a bunch of simpletons who can be bamboozled with slick lies. Whatever it is, it's not example of listening: It's an example of Cory Gardner trying to pull the wool over Colorado's eyes. And it's the kind of move that really should backfire.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Wed Jun 18, 2014 at 02:30 PM PDT.

Also republished by Colorado COmmunity and This Week in the War on Women.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site