Skip to main content

As our Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker desperately tries to spin away from documents showing he was allegedly at the center of a "criminal scheme" to help oligarchs launder campaign money and evade taxes, he tweeted this out on Friday.

At first glance, my reaction was "give me a break," but I figured I'd go to the Quarterly Census on Employment and Wages and see for myself. And if you do a skin-deep survey of the years 2005-2007, which is when Burke was Commerce Secretary under Doyle, it has a shred of truth, as Wisconsin was between 37th and 41st in private sector job growth in those years, while we've been between 35th and 37th in the 3 years that Walker has been governor. Granted, that's like saying losing 90 games in a baseball season isn't as bad as losing 95, (you still suck either way), but Walker's clearly trying for Politi-crap to give him a "mostly true" for that statement and trying to show the state wasn't well-off to begin with.

However, those 3 years mentioned by Walker happened to be the 3 lowest-performing years of job growth in the Doyle regime, as shown below. It's also important to remember that Doyle was viciously opposed by a GOP-led Legislature from 2003-2007, and only got a Dem majority in both houses for 2009 and 2010 (and you'll see Wisconsin kept afloat quite well compared to the rest of the nation), while Walker has been able to shove most anything he wants through the WisGOP rubber-stamps in the Legislature during his 3 years.

QCEW private sector job growth, Dec-Dec, 2002-2013

Doyle takes office Jan. 2003
2003 +0.23% (25th in U.S.)
2004 +1.69% (30th)
2005 +0.83% (41st)
2006 +0.92% (39th)
2007 +0.33% (37th)

Recession begins December 2007
2008 -2.34% (23rd)
2009 -5.05% (29th)
2010 +1.50% (11th)

Walker takes office, Jan. 2011
2011 +1.31% (35th)
2012 +1.47% (36th)
2013 +1.20% (37th)

Bad enough that we're reverting to the bottom half of the nation, as we did for much of the 2000s, but even that fact hides just how awful the job growth record has been for the Fitzwalkerstanis. And that reason is because the Bush years were brutal for the Midwest economy, in no small part due to massive offshoring of jobs in the previously-industrial Midwest, as well as lower population growth than the rest of the nation. In every one of the years between 2003 and 2007, more than half of the 7 Midwestern states had job rankings below 30th, so it's not that surprising that Wisconsin struggled in that same period.

Walker has been lucky enough to have his 3 years of office coincide with the jobs recovery under President Obama, and the new growth in the Midwest that has happened in the wake of the auto bailout and other measures that have helped reverse the decline under Dubya (Scotty never seems to bring up this. Wonder why). With that in mind, let's take a look at how Wisconsin has shaped up in that same period with our Midwestern neighbors, and the Walker effect becomes much more pronounced.

Doyle takes office Jan. 2003
2003 +0.23% (1st of 7 states in Midwest!)
2004 +1.69% (3rd of 7)
2005 +0.83% (5th of 7)
2006 +0.92% (3rd of 7)
2007 +0.33% (4th of 7)

Recession begins December 2007
2008 -2.34% (3rd of 7)
2009 -5.05% (4th of 7)
2010 +1.50% (3rd of 7)

Walker takes office, Jan. 2011
2011 +1.31% (LAST out of 7)
2012 +1.47% (LAST out of 7)
2013 +1.20% (6th out of 7)

So Wisconsin was a fairly normal Midwestern state when it came to job growth in the Doyle years (with the exception of 2003), but under Walker they have been horrible, and the 2011-2013 3-year total job increase of 4.04% is also the worst in our region. If you had a sports team that was consistent around the middle of its division, and then had 3 years at or near the basement, there's no way you'd accept that coach staying on if you gave anything resembling a damn.

But Walker has to somehow convince people that he shouldn't get run, so that's why he's desperately shelling out $250,000 for a negative ad blitz that basically says the Doyle/Burke years were even worse, and therefore you can't risk going back to them. Too bad for him that any kind of drilling down into the numbers makes the Doyle years look prosperous compared to the crap we've seen for the last 3 1/2 years.

Put John Doe aside (for now)- THIS is the primary reason Walker should be bounced in 4 1/2 months. And messaging like this from the Wisconsin Dems would be a complete winner, combining the crookedness and economic failure that has been the Walker era, with a better way forward with Burke. It has the added advantage of being true.


Originally posted to Jake formerly of the LP on Sun Jun 22, 2014 at 07:50 AM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site