Skip to main content

Happy Independence Day to everyone….

This week in the “War on Women,” the fireworks are already exploding when, in a 5-4 decision, all five conservative, male SCOTUS Justices ruled (#SCROTUMSRULED) in favor of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga, in the now infamous, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case, and their right to opt out of covering female birth control based on “sincere religious belief.”  Which means, they, or any for-profit corporation, can deny coverage of female birth control, IUD’s, or any other form of FEMALE birth control based on the religious beliefs of the owner(s) of that corporation.  Men, however get to keep their Viagra, Cialis and penis pumps. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote, as a concern, in her blistering dissent, "’The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.’"  In simpler terms:  “You all majorly screwed this one up!”

It was a limited ruling, confined to only being able to opt out of birth control based on (Christian) religious reasons, apparently as a way to keep society full of virgins and mothers. However, Justice Alito and the gang made extra sure that no other religion could exercise their belief systems and deny any other access to coverage, such as blood transfusions or medical procedures, JUST FEMALE BIRTH CONTROL.  Which is a problem, just not to Christian zealots like the five male justices of the Supreme Court. Justice Bader also thinks selective coverage based on religious fervor is an issue: “’The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers' beliefs access to contraceptive coverage’”

This ruling represents what has grown from the rooted belief that corporations are (Christian) people and (Christian) people are vehemently able to practice their (Christian) faith. Because we have religious freedom (and The Religious Freedom and Restoration Act) in the United States of America, however, not all people hold the same belief and therefore could challenge the right to practice their belief systems in their corporations in court using this case as precedence. This is what Justice Ginsberg is afraid will happen. Also, remember there is a tax benefit to ACA and companies who opt in get that benefit. If they are now not legally obligated to include birth control, then they are receiving full tax benefits without providing full coverage!

What really galls me, aside from the ruling rooted in religion, and the fact that Hobby Lobby invested in birth control and gets much of its merchandise from the very pro-abortion country of China who treat human workers like garbage (very “Pro-life” of you, Hobby Lobby) is that is all a bunch of malarkey. The GOP complains about “welfare queens” having babies they cannot afford (this euphemism is so far from the truth). But if that is REALLY the case, then provide them access to affordable birth control and abortion care. While you’re at it, give it to all women. Then they say, “Well I’m not paying for your birth control, go and earn it!” Well which is it?? This only emphasizes to me that it is really about keeping women from having sex until they are able to have children, if not “keep your legs closed!” This also has a eugenic quality because the sect of women most affected are women of color. This is who they are speaking of when they say, “Don’t have babies when you can’t afford them!”  Women of color earn the least amount to every dollar of a white man. It disproportionately affects that population. So then it becomes about boxing in a definition of which women should procreate and which women should not procreate. Use the southern strategy of, “Welfare queens having babies they cannot afford” to create laws which don’t expand Medicaid and do not pay for birth control or abortion services so they literally starve a disproportionate amount of families of color, discouraging them from “breeding,” then use the “Pro-life” argument against the White women to justify removing access to birth control they probably can afford and limit abortion rights in order to force the birth of more White children. Either way you slice it, the only other choice, according to the heteropatriarchy is simply to not have sex and if you do it better not be consequence free!  By the way, aside from the birth control aspect of, well, birth control, there are many other medicinal benefits: help with perimenopausal symptoms, irregular periods, easing of cramping and migraines, clears the skin by reducing levels of testosterone-producing oils, reduces your risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers up to 70%, as well as relief of actual endometrial symptoms (a condition I have), which is essentially a rotting of the uterus and is very painful.  Still, idiots will only argue the “virgin and mother” aspect of their beliefs about birth control.  I mean, what the hell do penis pumps relieve except penile limpness? NOTHING…not a single damn thing! And Viagra? According to WebMD, “Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension or high blood pressure of the lungs” to which there isn’t a cure and “Erectile dysfunction.” But hey, we all know who buys it for the most part and why it is used…hell that is why it was invented!

So what to do now? Well first of all, do not argue about on Facebook. Those nitwits who believe they shouldn’t “pay for us to have sex” do not care about facts, only fiction. Their brains will literally explode if they did get convinced and therefore they keep residing in “lala land!” I actually had a man against the decision of SCOTUS say it was because he is opposed to paying for birth control and Viagra. The problem is the Supreme Court didn’t argue against Viagra and he was complaining about the paying of birth control to a bunch of women, instead of talking to his guy friends. In other words, instead of saying to guys, “I am opposed to the paying for birth control and Viagra, and these ladies got the shaft, we need to rally to get rid of Viagra or include birth control again, ” he instead wondered what the hell we women were complaining about and proceeded to go on about not paying for our sex, oblivious to its other uses, the fact we are paying for men to have sex, and also ignored the fact that IT IS A HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE!  So ignore those idiots too! You waste time that way.  No, what we need to do is boycott Hobby Lobby and the businesses who also wanted to get in with this decision. Then we need get rid of the “Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Next, we need to get a new precedent established in order for the Court to hear it. Supreme Court cases cannot be overturned once decided, therefore a new case will have to be established. Another alternative, is for Congress (a heavily Democratic one) to tweak ACA or somehow create a new law which will incorporate birth control as part of the plan. I think there is a loophole, especially when there is a tax credit involved for corporations to offer ENTIRE benefits of ACA! Finally, we need to fight back with our vote. Stop electing Presidents who appoint these fools. There isn’t any quick fixes, but it can be undone.

In other news....
Michelle Howard is the Navy’s first female four star admiral!

Oscar Pistorius claims PTSD to somehow get him out of the trail for killing his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp.

In Pakistan, A newlywed couple had their throats slit by the bride’s family in an “honor killing” because they dare dream to marry for love.

Pope Francis avoids reforming Catholicism to be more women-friendly by joking “women was from a rib.”

July 1, 2014 marked one year since 10,000 people rallied at the Texas State Capitol to support Wendy Davis after her epic filibuster!

Senator Barbara Boxer is shining a light on CEDAW and I-VAWA in hopes of passing united international legislation!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Humans don't have rights in America; (0+ / 0-)

    Property, guns, corporation & teapublicans do.

    This country was a lie from the beginning; the evil 1% are reminding us of that.

    I voted Tuesday, May 6, 2014 because it is my right, my responsibility and because my parents moved from Alabama to Ohio to vote. Unfortunately, the republicons want to turn Ohio into Alabama.

    by a2nite on Fri Jul 04, 2014 at 07:59:02 AM PDT

  •  Ugh in regard to the Pope on women. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    penelope pnortney

    Double ugh on this, which makes absolutely NO SENSE to me:

    Francis returned to his argument that people should have children rather than pets, even if the task was more demanding. "The emotional relationship with animals is easier, more programmable," he said. "An animal is not free whereas having a child is a complex matter."
    Pope-a-dude, don't mess with the Pooties. K? Srsly.

    Lady Jane.

    The only hawk I like is the kind that has feathers. My birding blogs: and

    by cany on Fri Jul 04, 2014 at 08:06:51 AM PDT

  •  I agree re: Ugh to the pope for his incredibly (0+ / 0-)

    stupid comments. I suppose the vast majority of all the catholic sheeple will find it oh so clever and ever so endearing. I was of the opinion that a supreme court ruling CAN be overturned, although this diarist said it cannot. If that is correct, then why are we working so hard to overturn Citizens United? We also need to work on overturning the horrifying Hobby Lobby disaster. And do not worry, I began my boycott of them two years ago, at least.

    •  Catholic Puzzles (0+ / 0-)

      Pope Francis is a puzzler, alright. In addition to what is said here about him, he then confronts his critics who are calling some of his exhortations communism, Marxism or socialism, he said in an interview published on Sunday that communists had stolen the flag of Christianity.

      He was asked about a blog post in the Economist magazine that said he sounded like a Leninist...

      "I can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel," he said, citing Biblical passages about the need to help the poor, the sick and the needy.

      "Communists say that all this is communism. Sure, twenty centuries later. So when they speak, one can say to them: 'but then you are Christian'," he said, laughing.

      Go figure...

      Do keep in mind, though, that the Flailing Five Justices who ruled for Hobby Lobby are conservative Roman Catholics. Sending a message to US Catholics who ignore the Church's teaching on birth control, are we? Pretty transparent, I'd say.

      God's preference is for more people to be included, (not excluded through doctrine),...whenever the circle is shrinking, where people are being excluded or disliked, God is not served. -Rev. Alice Connor

      by paz3 on Fri Jul 04, 2014 at 12:08:33 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Yes, Supreme Court decisions can be overturned. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      penelope pnortney

      Not overturned in the sense that a higher court can rule against it.

      They can be overturned by:

      a) New legislation that moots the case
      b) Constitutional amendments that moot the case
      c) The Supreme Court can overturn its own rulings.

      Ten famous overturned cases

      "A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling 'Stop!'"—William F. Buckley, Jr.—Founder of the conservative policy magazine "National Review"

      by Village Vet on Fri Jul 04, 2014 at 03:41:05 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thank you yes on the SCOTUS Error (0+ / 0-)

        I meant to write "can" and not "cannot," thank you for catching that one! I literally changed the idea after that word and forgot to change that one. Also, thank you for all your clarification. You said it all here! :)

        "Fatigue makes cowards of us all" -Vince Lombardi

        by cboswell on Sat Jul 05, 2014 at 05:26:51 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  All been covered, except for the ingenious (0+ / 0-)

    SCROTUMs and reproDICKtive.

    No homework 'cos school's out . . .  .

    Their real God is money-- Jesus just drives the armored car, and his hat is made in China. © 2009 All Rights Reserved

    by oblomov on Fri Jul 04, 2014 at 01:40:25 PM PDT

  •  This (0+ / 0-)

    We the corporations and fetuses of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union...

    Isn't that the constitution the supremes upheld?

    We need a world in which we ask "What's happened to you?" more and "What's wrong with you?" less. (From a comment by Kossack nerafinator)

    by ramara on Sat Jul 05, 2014 at 12:55:56 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site