Skip to main content

TransCanada oil pipeline
Juliet Eilperin reports that the Nebraska Supreme Court will hold its first hearing in a case over the route of the Keystone XL pipeline in September. Although the court could rule as early at October in Thompson v. Heineman, it might also not rule for several months, well past the midterm elections. As I wrote in February, that wouldn't exactly be a surprise. Eilperin notes:
A[n] administration official familiar with the State Department's decision-making process, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said it is "highly unlikely that a decision will be made before the mid-term election" given the court's schedule.

"This is not because of politics. It’s just a reflection of the gravity of this decision," the official said. "It doesn’t make sense to have the agencies give us their best opinion on whether or not the Keystone pipeline should go forward if the information on which they base it changes dramatically, and it’s entirely possible the Nebraska Supreme Court could require a change in the route and nullify the opinions given to the Secretary of State about this project."

The Nebraska governor's office approved a new route through the state for the $5.4 billion pipeline last year. The old route was problematic, critics had said. Among other things, it endangered fragile wetlands of the state's sand hills. That was a major reason behind President Obama's 2012 rejection of TransCanada's original application to build Keystone XL. The company promptly submitted a new application with a new route through Nebraska. That's the one being contested in court.

For decades Nebraska's elected five-member Public Service Commission had overseen approval of grain warehouses, taxis, buses and power lines. The commission was established for the same reason a state railway commission was set up in the late 1800s—as a means to keep governors from doing favors to railroad corporations. In 2011, the state legislature passed the Major Oil Pipeline Siting Act, which added pipelines to the commission's purview. But it then passed another law, the Oil Pipeline Route Certification Act. This transferred authority for approving Keystone XL to the governor's office without the Public Service Commission being involved.

Gov. Republican Gov. Dave Heineman did sign off on the pipeline, giving builder TransCanada the power of eminent domain. What many saw as an end run around the approval process brought a lawsuit from three landowners along the new route. And in February, state Judge Stephanie Stacy agreed with them, ruling that the method of approval was breached the state constitution. In April, Heineman asked the Nebraska Supreme Court to overturn Stacy's ruling.

The Obama administration had previously set May as the completion date for its lengthy review of whether the pipeline is in the "national interest," a requirement for any pipeline, bridge, tunnel or tramway that crosses international boundaries. The State Department has been assessing more than 2 million public comments and the views of several federal departments to determine whether Keystone XL actually is in the national interest or falls short.

It was widely expected that Secretary of State John Kerry would present his recommendation on the pipeline to President Obama sometime in May or early June. But the administration decided in April that it would wait until resolution of the Nebraska routing appeal.

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Jul 09, 2014 at 11:13 AM PDT.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site