Skip to main content

When we were kids our parents realized at an early stage that while reasoning with us was preferable, instilling fear was a sure-fire technique.  Do you remember all of the warnings we used to hear about crossing the street, talking to strangers or perhaps taking gifts from someone you don't know.  I'm sure that you can remember many more, but more importantly these warning, whether based on reality or fantasy, always had the same result.   They instilled enough fear in us  so that we would abide by these warnings without question.  Remember, what made the 60s so revolutionary is that we began to question this blind obedience to fear and think for ourselves.  Yet, there are still many who are susceptible to the fear gambit.  Lots of people are willing to believe whatever someone in authority proclaims to be the truth.  It is a fact that the GOP's tactic of choice for many years is to press the "fear" button.  If we listen to them we find that there are so many things to be afraid of, to be very afraid of.

First we all remember that they proclaimed that birth control and abortions would lead to an unprecedented period of sexual promiscuity and unwanted births.  It is a fact that the birth rate of babies born to teenagers has significantly diminished.

We need to be afraid of all gun control laws because "they" are trying to take away our 2nd Amendment freedoms.  This is nonsense on its face of it.  The modest attempt at a national background check system would have no negative impact on those who would have guns.  It would however, perhaps, refuse to put guns in the hands of those who, for all of our sakes, should not have them.

Resolving the immigration issues confronted by our nation will only cause Americans to lose jobs and increase the crime rate.  It is clear that resolving the immigration issues will increase the tax revenue of our country and will provide much-needed workers in sectors that are in need of them.  It will also tighten the borders and reduce crime and drug smuggling.

Continuing unemployment insurance will only lead to people not willing to look for jobs, since we are paying them not to work.  This one is not even worth a comment.

Of course we additionally need to be afraid of the IRS and it supposed harassment of right leaning organizations.

We hear that  marriage equality will endanger the institution of marriage. How?  Nobody has ever explained this.

We need to pass new voter registration and voting laws to prevent voter fraud.  There has been virtually no voter fraud, but the new laws will prevent many who typically vote Democratic from getting to the polls.

The Ukrainian Crisis, the Iraq Crisis, the Benghazi Crisis, the Syrian Crisis, the current border crisis all are reasons to be very afraid of this President's willingness to ignore security issues we confront.  These outcries and warnings come from those foreign affairs experts that brought us the Iraq War.  Do they really think that they still have any credibility?

U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) pauses during a network news interview on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 23, 2012. Paul was stopped at an airport on Monday for setting off an alarm and refusing a patdown, prompting his father, U.S. presidential candidate Ron Paul, to accuse security officials of being part of an

The list can go on and on.  It is a tactic that was used against Civil Rights advocates and Anti-war demonstrators and women's rights advocates.  'They are all trying to change our country and take away your freedom to live in the America we love", we were told.  "They are dangerous and we need to protect ourselves from them or all will be lost.'  .  We are not little children anymore.    The fact is, maybe what WE should really fear is the GOP.
Cross-posted on

Originally posted to RationalPolitics on Thu Jul 10, 2014 at 03:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Political Language and Messaging.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Yes, I used to think it was a gambit, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    but have come to the conclusion that the Cons exist in a state of uncertainty and the fear they promulgate is their reality. And the reason they exist in a state of uncertainty is, I suggest, because their sensory perceptions are somehow skewed. Mostly, they rely on their sense of sight and we all know "appearances are deceiving."
    While we have come to recognize that vision and hearing are often deficient in people and there's a need for corrective action, if the sense of taste and smell are missing or deficient, we tend not to notice. And people who are "out of touch" are so common, it's not even recognized as a disability.
    But touch, I would argue, is what enables us to validate our other sensory perceptions. Touch keeps us connected to the material world. "Pinch me" is a request for verification.
    I suspect it's even possible that politicians accused of inappropriate touching are innocent in the sense that they do it out of habit (monkey see, monkey do) and "think nothing of it." That someone might not want to be touched does not occur to them, since there's no sign.

    by hannah on Thu Jul 10, 2014 at 03:37:59 AM PDT

  •  Fear, yes. . . (0+ / 0-)

    but the full retenue of manipulative tools used by conservatives is fear, hatred, and resentment.  They have found that if you can instill these in the voters, you own them.

    Canem Praeteri, Cave Modo Hominem. (Never mind the dog, just watch out for the human)

    by T C Gibian on Thu Jul 10, 2014 at 07:27:07 AM PDT

    •  I couldn't agree more. The days of constructive... (0+ / 0-)

      I couldn't agree more. The days of constructive bipartisanship seem to sadly be a faint memory never to be seen again. Unfortunately, it is we the People who lose as the pols play there political games.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site