Skip to main content

I'm sick to hell of politically correct attitudes that we have to respect the ignorant and stupid opinions of those who disagree with reality.

I do NOT respect opinions that are based on hate, racism, or sexism.
I do NOT respect opinions that ignore scientific or historic fact.
I do NOT respect opinions that are based on lies, rhetoric, or propaganda.
I do NOT respect opinions that are based on greed, false equivalence, or religious doctrine.
I do NOT respect opinions that are based on ignorance and stupidity.

"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." - Benjamin Franklin
There is no place that these nonsense opinions are illustrated better than the twenty four hour news coverage where show after show has the same five stories with different representatives of opposing sides (no matter how misinformed a side might be) sitting around arguing. I am over it!  

If we stopped pretending that unreasoned opinions are legitimate to the conversation, we would not be arguing about whether or not climate change was real, but rather, how to make the greatest impact on climate change in the shortest amount of time. We have to stop arguing with troglodytes about the existence or non-existence of problems in the world and focus on solutions that will lead humanity to progress.

Media outlets must stop wasting everyone's time by creating false, sensationalized ‘debates’ by giving a voice to the louts of our nation. Stop giving the redneck, moronic, climate change denier, and the idiotic, bible beating, creationist a seat at the discussion table with scientists and historians. Stop interviewing the racist homophobes down the street and giving them the same legitimacy as the human rights activist. It is not good television and it is vastly destructive to the country and the world. Stop giving ignorance an equal voice!

We could be moving past the false arguments (or at least not stagnating to this degree) if media would quit making the ignorant and the haters relevant. Not to say that we should ignore that they exist, but we should not give them the spotlight to spread their dimness. Just laugh them off. They are not qualified to be leading discussion, policy, or public opinion. We need standards in media coverage.

A healthy exchange of ideas, perspectives, and opinions is important, but every single ridiculous, poorly thought out, baseless, uneducated, ignorant opinion does not need to be represented in the mainstream media's conversation. This isn't a left or a right issues. It is an all encompassing issue and there needs to be some sort of litmus test that weeds out the quack ideas. Right now the standards are based on what will bring a program attention even if it is for an insanely stupid guest. Again, bad for the country, bad for the world.

The job of news organizations is to report what's going on in the world, which means you may have to actually do some work and educate the American public on a little bit of history so they can understand why certain things are occurring. We should not be arguing irrelevant points to appease the dumber-than-shit, Sarah Palinesque, illiterates in the United States!

“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.” - Harlan Ellison

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site