Two stories have started making their way through the deniersphere, and (contain your surprise) both are blatantly misleading.
The first is a Daily Caller story on penguins reporting that because penguin populations are booming, global warming scares are unfounded. Media Matters debunks the article with responses from the actual scientists. They told MM that the reason for the supposed "boom" in population is actually just better observation. Scientists in Antarctica have recently discovered new colonies, meaning penguin populations are bigger than previously thought. This does not mean — as the scientists were quick to point out — penguins are not at risk from climate change.
Meanwhile, a report supposedly found that wind turbines are 10 times more likely to catch fire than previously thought. Carbon Brief takes this one on, noting that the data comes from an anti-wind group and that HUGE assumptions were made. While it's too complex to explain fully, the bottom line is this: the anti-wind group compared their data on turbine fires to an assessment released by the UK trade association for wind power that reported 10 times the number of incidents. Only problem is, the incidents reported by the trade group were "overwhelmingly near events where no injury, harm or damage resulted" (in other words, not tantamount to the number of fires). In fact, there are actually fewer fires than previously thought!