Skip to main content

Quintessential Villager, John Dickerson, Chief Political Correspondent for Slate, has either accidentally published an audition piece he wrote for The Onion, or he has truly jumped the shark. In a sidebar to his post, Mr. Dickerson emphasizes his gobsmacking main point about the 2016 GOP Presidential field, or as I call it, his punch line:

The class of candidates for 2016 has the potential to be the most robust in almost 40 years—perhaps in modern Republican history.
For a more serious take on the 2016 GOP field, see Jed Lewison's post on Chris Christie, yesterday, subtitled: The 2016 GOP presidential field absolutely sucks.

If you doubt that Mr. Dickerson's work is satire, consider that in describing the GOP field he uses the word "ideas" 22 times, but actually specifically mentions just one idea, Herman Cain's ridiculous and ruinous 9-9-9 tax proposal from 2012, which Mr. Dickerson cites as "the most memorable idea of 2012". Is that not comedy gold?

If you still doubt the nature of the article, consider the reaction to it by Slate readers, who posted over 1,700 comments and rated this the top comment:

I love it when Slate reprints articles from The Onion.
Alas, I fear that Mr. Dickerson did not intend to post satire, but intends to report on the 2016 GOP Presidential field as though Republican primary voters are just lost sheep wandering around looking for someone with the right "ideas" to lead them. Psst, Mr. Dickerson, in the real world, Republicans hate ideas and mistrust people, like scientists, who have ideas. Real Republicans are much more comfortable with orthodoxy and rigidity.

Another D.C. Villager gone nose-deaf to irony.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site