Skip to main content

It seems like in the last decade their have been a lot of adaptions of books to the small screen just as there have to the big screen.  Some have been more successful than others.  The granddaddy of them all would have to A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones, but True Blood, Dexter, Pretty Little Liars, The Walking Dead and Sherlock have had a great deal of success as well.  There are others as well that are more of a mixed bag/outright failures:  Legend of the Seeker[based on Goodkind's books], Dresden Files, Lying Game, Pillars of Earth, Under the Dome.  I'm sure there are others as well.  House of Cards and Orange is the New Black might be based on books as well[or based on a series based on books].  Feel free to discuss other adaptations as well.  Looking over the list I think one thing is clear:  the closer the adaptations stay to the books the better.  This makes sense.  The books aren't popular because the author is good at naming characters; they are popular because the author is good at telling a story.  So if you don't stick with that story than you are just throwing darts coming up with a new story.

The Dresden Files and Legend of the Seeker were both hot messes since they both seemed to have little resemblance to the series on which they purported to be based other than rough sketches of the main characters and their names.  I recently read two books that I thought I'd look at in more depth that were adapted for television:  Outlander and the Cold Dish.  Follow me over the squiggle for spoilers galore though I won't give away the ending to The Cold Dish.

The Cold Dish by Craig Johnson is the first of the Walt Longmire Mysteries.  It was a little outside of my comfort zone in terms of the types of books that I normally read, but I'm glad I did.  As the series title, it is close to a hard-boiled detective story though don't hold me to that as I am not sure as to the precise definition of a hard-boiled detective story.  The Cold Dish centers around the murder of a rapist and the subsequent targeting/murder of others involved in the rape of a young Indian girl.  Walt Longmire is the sheriff of the Wyoming county where the novel takes place and the rape investigation/trial as well as the death of his wife have hit him hard, but as the book progresses he seems to rejoin the world at large.  In the beginning, the reader is led to believe that the rapists had gotten off scott-free as frequently happens in rape cases, but as the book progresses we learn that they were convicted/sentenced.  But it still left a sour taste in many character's mouths who were unhappy with the extent of the punishment.

But the novel is so much more than just a look at a murder investigation.  There is a lot of sarcastic, humorous banter between the characters as well as well-fleshed characters/backstories as well as some side stories.  You care about the characters and the ending packs an emotional punch for everyone involved.  It is also a very interesting look at both Wyoming and Indian/Cheyenne/Sioux culture.  A central character in the story is a sharp shooter rifle that was used by the Cheyenne at Custer's Last Stand, and then hidden and passed down through the generations.  You also get a sense that some characters are more attuned to Indian culture than others[even the little things like whether to call them Indians or Native Americans].  For someone like me that doesn't really now much about the culture it was very interesting.

Longmire was adapted by A&E and is now in its third season.  I watched the pilot on Netflix after finishing the book.  It started out so promisingly, but then it fell flat and collapsed under its own weight into just another procedural.  The opening scene seemed right out of the book.  Katee Sackhoff, Starbuck from the recent Battlestar Gallactica, struck me as perfect casting for Vic, but then it seemed like the 30 seconds we see her in the opening scene is all we see her the whole episode despite her being a major character in the book.  Henry Standing Bear came across as much more stereotypical than the nuanced portrayal in the book.  When he becomes a suspect in the case, the viewer can't help but get the impression that the reason is racist.  In the book when he becomes a suspect there are very good reasons, and Walt never believes that Henry did it, but feels it is a professional responsibility to keep the option open.   The murder itself lost all nuance as the victim went from being a rapist to a heroic father trying to save his daughter from a brothel with the perpetrator being exactly who you'd think.  You could try to project that the father maybe wasn't a completely good guy as he had abandoned his daughter for likely racist reasons, but as a viewer that seems to take a couple of leaps.  Walt's interaction with the reservation also seemed much changed for the worse.  The ending was essentially the complete opposite of the book and very unsatisfying.  It seemed an attempt to make Walt flawed, because the TV show was too lazy to explore his actual flaws as fleshed out in the book.  I think they would have been much better served to spend 3-4 episodes per book and then do 3-4 books over the course of the season.  Sherlock, the closest analog, takes the equivalent of 2 episodes per story and I think the Sherlock Holmes stories are shorter than a full book.

Outlander by Diana Gabaldon is a different beast entirely.  I actually thought when I first picked up the novel that it would be closer to my comfort zone of epic/high fantasy, but it isn't really.  Despite the main character Claire traveling back in time, it is really more of a historical fiction/romance.  The novel is about a WWII nurse who while on vacation with her husband is transported back in time to the 1700s.  She is then caught up in the conflict between the Scottish and the English as she both tries to survive and make a life for herself as she also is trying to get back to her time.  I think my expectations influenced my reaction to the book, but it was still an  enjoyable read.  Claire is a strong character who is just trying to survive and get home and perhaps discovers something else about herself along the way.  It was a very enjoyable read.

It was adapted for television by Starz and released for viewing a couple of days ago on Starz's website and your cable's VOD services.  It formally debuts this Saturday, I think.  In many ways it is better than the book.  I've already rewatched it once which is something that I only ever do for Game of Thrones and perhaps Doctor Who.  I just fell in love with the cinematography and the music and the pacing and the costumes and the scenery.  The pilot is pretty much a scene for scene portrayal of the book up to the arrival at the Scottish castle.  Some of the dialog even feels like it came right from the book.  Most of the pilot takes place in the 1940s and there seems to be a lot of attention to detail.  There is a flash back scene of Claire doing field medicine during the war which is very well done, and a nice touch considering they probably could have gotten away with not having it.  It really has the feel, much like some of HBO's productions, of a very long movie being presented for TV viewing.  I also like how the Gaelic speech isn't subtitled as it really helps the viewer to identify with Claire.  The internal monologue voice-over by Claire is very well done and serves the same purpose.  The vase observation from the book was included as well, and I thought it worked even better on screen with her looking in a shop window. It came across a little hokey in the book for me. I had to double check that Frank and Black Jack Randall really were the same actor.  Much like Orphan Black, there is a resemblance, but they also are different.  The 1700s version seems to have a harder appearance as you would expect from a harder time.  For anyone who is a fan of the books or even someone who has never read the books, I couldn't recommend this show enough.  I know a number of people around here are fans of the books.

Originally posted to shaso on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 01:42 PM PDT.

Also republished by Readers and Book Lovers.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Diana Gabaldon started Outlander not knowing (11+ / 0-)

    what genre she was writing, and when it came time to sell the book, a publisher wanted, loved it, but had the same problem. What is it? I heard the publisher took two years from the time it bought the book until it was released because they couldn't figure out how to market it.

    (Publishers always say they want something different, but that's a lie. They want something they know how to sell or that they know will sell because someone's already done it.)

    Anyway, it was finally published as historical romance/time-travel, although being a very well-educated woman, DG was often called someone who's not your typical writer of romance.

    I'm a romance writer, and she used to come to our national conference way back when Outlander was first released. I ran into her in an elevator once. :)

    Anyway, tons of readers have been waiting a long time for Outlander to make it to the screen. Funny that now, it's probably because Game of Thrones came first and is so popular. Starz looked around and said, "Hey, GOT worked. Let's find something like that. It'll probably work, too."

    I was lucky enough to see the first episode already.  You're right. Gorgeous scenery. I thought they could have done a better job portraying the circle ceremony, that it could have looked spookier rather than... I guess they were going for magical.

    Jamie has incredible bones structure in his face and a luscious accent. Claire came off suitably tough. I think it's going to be a faithful adaptation of the book.

    Confession time: When I'm not ranting about politics, I write romance novels

    by teresahill on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 01:56:59 PM PDT

    •  circle scene (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      susans, Aunt Pat

      I think it is a fine line between how spooky/magical it is supposed to be and how much it is more of a reenactment if you get my meaning.  It is perhaps more faithful than most reenactments would be, but I'm not sure that means it is full on Druid despite the events later.  I think the image of the young woman coming back to pick up something she dropped and then sitting contemplatively leans towards reenactment.

  •  I will republish this for you (7+ / 0-)

    to Reader's & Book Lovers at 10:00 PM EDT.  We already have a diary at 5 and 8 PM in the regular schedule, today.

    I remember waaaaay back when Pride and Prejudice was done on TV in five episodes with David Rintoul and Elizabeth Garvie.  I was entranced and it is still my favorite of all the ones made.

    My friends disagree.

    I do not have cable so I will miss Outlander, but I am interested in hearing about it and I am glad it seems to be well done.

    Join us at Bookflurries-Bookchat on Wednesday nights 8:00 PM EST

    by cfk on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 02:04:20 PM PDT

  •  I will add (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Youffraita, susans, Aunt Pat

    There is only one full on sex scene in Outlander, and in my opinion it is remarkably tasteful.  Certainly more tasteful than I was expecting/dreading.

  •  We don't have Starz (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    susans, Aunt Pat

    and I'm crying, because I love Outlander. After Dragonfly in Amber, I pretty much don't care about the rest of the series, but those two stand on their own just fine. I guess I'll have to wait until they make it to Netflix or Amazon Prime or some pirate site.

    Being "pro-life" means believing that every child born has a right to food, education, and access to health care.

    by Jilly W on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 03:19:38 PM PDT

  •  We have been enjoying Longmire (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mayim, shaso, Aunt Pat, niemann

    even with its many flaws. I'm reading the latest book now. How many times do I have to read that Vic has blue-black hair without thinking of Starbuck's blond ponytail? Slightly disconcerting and I do wonder why the hair color change (yes, I am being picky).

    Outlander was better than I expected and I look forward to the rest of the series. I was hopeful for something good, since producer Ronald Moore has done good stuff in the past as a writer, producer and director, starting with ST:TNG. And I loved Battlestar Galactica, except for the ending, which sucked.

    •  Longmire (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      susans, Aunt Pat, niemann

      Since I enjoyed the book so much more than the show, I am hesitant to watch more episodes if it risks spoiling the books, but otherwise it wasn't so bad that I wouldn't be willing to give it a couple of more episodes.  Given the changes in the first episode, it seems like it wouldn't, but I thought I'd check what you think.

      I didn't mind the ending to BSG.  They were clearly always go to end up at Earth; the only question was when.  I know the ending rubbishes the thought that they started on Earth as well, but meh.

      •  Re: Longmire's "procedural" plotting (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        I'll start first with the qualification that I haven't read any of the books -- which I hear are fairly different from the TV show in some respects in terms of some of the characterizations.

        The feedback I've read from fans of the show is that for the first two seasons there was a consensus that the "murder of the week" formula was frustrating.  Viewers cared about the characters so much, they didn't really care "whodunit," or about a bunch of characters they would never see again after that episode.  They wanted more character development of the regular characters.

        The third season -- which ended this week -- seemed to get the message, and I think fewer than half of the episodes had the "murder mystery procedural" formula.  I found it much more satisfying.

        I should also qualify my comments because I actually appeared on the show once, and it films literally three minutes from my house!  But aside from that, I do just enjoy it as a TV show, as I find the actors and characters interesting and appealing, and the production values very good.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site