Skip to main content

According to a recent Pew Research Foundation report, liberals and conservatives live in different worlds. The report depicts a society where finding common ground to confront shared problems is all but impossible. Pew’s research provides empirical evidence for the common-sense notion that America’s political culture is broken.

The report details how those on the Left and the Right do not talk with one another, have separate social networks, different values, consume different news media, live in neighborhoods with politically like-minded people, and possess different attitudes about America’s changing ethnic and racial demographics.

The report notes that "far more liberals than conservatives think it is important that a community have racial and ethnic diversity (76% vs. 20%). At the same time, conservatives are more likely than liberals to attach importance to living in a place where many people share their religious faith (57% vs. 17% of liberals).”

Most importantly, the Left and the Right cannot agree on basic facts about the nature of empirical reality. Movement conservatives are immersed in a fantasy land of mythological thinking on a range of issues from global warming and science to the economy and foreign policy.

Liberals and conservatives are also unable to agree on the nature of the common good and the role to be played by the social compact in American life.

As Pew’s new report suggests, how can a society come together to solve its problems if its members cannot agree on basic facts?

While little discussed in the report, attitudes about race and the color line are central fissures in polarized America. The oft-discussed “browning of America,” and the country’s changing demographics, are a source of anxiety for many white Americans. The ahistorical claim (whiteness is an expanding and adaptive racial category; there are “white” people today who would not have been considered white in the earlier parts of the 20th and 19th centuries) that in the near future white people will no longer be a majority group in the United States is a potent tool for white conservatives to mobilize their base through division and fear.

A sophisticated and nuanced understanding of American politics requires that one grapple with white supremacy’s enduring power to shape the political terrain of the United States. Extreme political polarization is a reflection of how the Republican and Democratic parties have positioned themselves on questions of race and social equality. The Democratic Party is identified as the party of “racial minorities.” The Republican Party is almost exclusively white. Consequently, both organizations have crafted political strategies which they believe best leverage their voting public.

The Democratic Party is more inclusive and seeks to maintain and expand its support among people of color. The Republican Party has chosen from the Southern Strategy of the late 1960s onward, to use white identity politics, and a mix of overt and covert racist appeals, to mobilize white voters.

The Tea Party, the most powerful faction in the GOP, is a typical example of that process: its members are more racially resentful, have higher levels of white racial animus than “mainstream” conservatives, and are beginning to think of their political interests in explicitly racial terms.

And because the Republican Party is increasingly dependent on a shrinking base of older white conservatives voters, its leaders have decided to pursue a strategy of voter suppression, harassment and intimidation to limit access to the franchise by non-whites as a way of gaining an electoral advantage.

Racial attitudes and partisanship are deeply intertwined: together they have created the highly polarized American public.

The election of Barack Obama, the United States’ first black president, has been the political equivalent of pouring gasoline on dynamite. Obama is both black and a Democrat. He is the public face and leader of the Democratic Party. This is a perfect storm for white racial animus and extreme partisanship by the white right and the Tea Party GOP.

Hofstader’s famous “paranoid style in American politics” has combined with white supremacy and a right-wing propaganda machine to create a state of derangement among conservatives where the madness of birtherism, their Benghazi fetish-obsession, “death panels,” the Tea Party GOP’s embrace of the neoconfederacy and the American swastika (i.e. the Confederate flag), talk of secession and nullification, right-wing domestic terrorism, and an unprecedented lawsuit by Speaker of the House John Boehner against a sitting President, are accepted as normal politics.

Perhaps even more troubling, is how this destructive and seditious behavior is elevated as virtuous and “patriotic” by the right-wing media.

The symbolic power of a black man and his family in the White House, as well as Obama’s power as President of the United States, are unacceptable for contemporary white conservatives because their America was, is, and must always be a white republic. As demonstrated by recent research from UCLA’s Michael Tesler, the election of Barack Obama has activated “old-fashioned racism” and white racial resentment to such a degree that they now over-determine how white voters decide their partisan affiliation.

Tesler notes:

After at least two full decades of being unrelated to party identification, both old fashioned racism and anti-black affect have once again become significantly linked to white partisanship in the age of Obama.

The reaction by movement conservatives to the election of Barack Obama has destroyed any hopes that America is now a “post-racial society” or has moved "beyond race.” Tesler’s research on the relationship between white racial animus and partisan identification offers a chilling warning for the future of American politics along the colorline:

With Barack Obama now the Democratic face of partisan politics in America, though, the party identifications of the next cohort entering the electorate could be much more racialized. If the effect of Obama’s prominence is, in fact, to racialize this generation’s partisan attachments, the logical consequence would be a renewed alignment of party identification around race and racial attitudes in the years ahead.

If political polarization is threatening to break the American political order, the power of white racism and white racial resentment will make the United States’ politics even more dysfunctional.

White racism has a blast effect which hurls shrapnel at the common good and sabotages efforts to find shared solutions to issues of public concern. If as the Pew Research Center suggests, polarization has in fact broken American politics, then white racism is central to that outcome.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin is an excellent example of how racial segregation and political polarization have combined to create a dysfunctional politics. Milwaukee is (depending on the measures used) one of the most segregated cities in the United States. It is also in a highly contested swing-state where Republicans and Democrats battle for votes in counties and districts which are typified by strong partisan attachments and racial homogeneity. The Journal Sentinel’s special report on political polarization in Milwaukee explains how:

The city of Milwaukee is "majority minority," with blacks and Hispanics together (56% of the city's population) outnumbering whites. But the suburban counties of Waukesha, Washington and Ozaukee are less than 2% African-American and less than 5% Hispanic. The decades long migration into those counties has been almost exclusively white, and that has shaped the political map....

When political scientist Katherine Levine Einstein looked at metro areas with the most polarized terrains, she found they all ranked high in black-white segregation. As the nation has grown more diverse, the voting gap between whites and nonwhites also has grown. Milwaukee is more politically segregated than almost any other large northern metro.

"Racial segregation really is driving political segregation," says Einstein, a Milwaukee native and Boston University professor who is writing a book on political segregation in metropolitan America…

However, there are politically “neutral” projects, such as improving public transportation, roads, and water projects that should cross divides of race and party.

In Milwaukee, and other cities like it, this is not the case.

Professor Katherine Einstein offers a dim prognosis:

Einstein spoke Thursday at a one-day conference on "Dividing Lines," a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel series charting Milwaukee's growing political chasm. Marquette University Law School and the Journal Sentinel sponsored the event.

Einstein said her research showed political polarization can hinder regional cooperation.

“Things like mass transit, affordable housing, when they’re done on the regional level,” can enhance life for not just those in inner cities, but also for those in the suburbs, she said…

“When we’re trying to predict political polarization in metropolitan areas, the real story is race,” Einstein said.

Einstein said that more racially segregated areas show much higher levels of political polarization. Milwaukee is among the most racially segregated cities in America.

She said more politically polarized metropolitan areas exhibit more fragmented transit systems and are less able to plan together.

Discussing trends for the future, she asked, “Is there any room for optimism?”

She quickly answered her question: “Not really.”

The extreme political polarization documented by the Pew Research Foundation, and its relationship to white racial resentment and old fashioned racism, reflect a series of choices made by policy makers, the media, and other political actors on the Right.

Political polarization is part of a broader move in the Age of Austerity, neoliberalism, and the resulting “culture of cruelty,” to gin up white racism and racial resentment as a means of destroying the social safety net, criminalizing the working classes and the poor, and transferring more public and private resources to the 1 percent and the plutocrats.

The Republican Party’s language of “makers and takers” is a not too subtle cue that mobilizes white racial hostility and resentment towards black and brown people, as well as the poor and working classes, who are depicted as “useless eaters” who are “stealing” the resources of “White America” and a parasitic 1 percent—that latter being a group that through rent seeking behavior (see the Great Recession slogan “too big to fail”), corporate welfare, and a rigged tax code are extracting far more wealth and resources than they are contributing to American society.

The Republican Party’s long-term project is to destroy the legitimacy of the federal government.

The election of Barack Obama is a convenient means to that end: white hostility toward the United States’ first black president can be used to persuade white conservative voters to support policies that do not serve their economic interests. Unfortunately, for too many white American voters, the symbolic politics of white supremacy are more compelling than finding shared solutions to common economic challenges and problems across lines of race, class and party.

The Tea Party GOP’s efforts to “make the government weak enough to drown in a bathtub like a baby” have been advanced through unprecedented levels of obstructionism in Congress, as well as overt racial and hyper-partisan hostility toward Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, respectively.

The White Right’s politics of racial resentment and ideological extremism will continue for a number of reasons. White racial anxiety about changing demographics is pushing aging white voters into the arms of the Tea Party GOP. An assault on the voting rights of black and brown people, the young, as well as the poor and working classes, is amplifying the power of white conservative voters.

New research by Amy Krosch and David Amodio of New York University has suggested that as resources become scarcer, white Americans will become more racially tribalistic as a sense of racial group interest and threat is activated. This provides an incentive to continue with the politics of austerity because those policies could potentially convert white voters to the Republican Party.

The Republican Party’s perverse, destructive and irresponsible behavior will both continue and increase in the future because said actions pay political dividends.

The Pew report on political polarization in American politics is a warning about a future where austerity, racism and political polarization have destabilized and shattered the centrist norms that once made American democracy a model system for the rest of the world.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  as the GOP's "demographic problem" and the old age (10+ / 0-)

    of most of their votes continues to eat away at their core voting bloc, the gnashing of teeth and balling of fists over their own loss of power and privilege in society will get louder and more exaggerated over time. White resentment, especially in the GOP, will rise, even sharply, for a long time.

    I figure that our inherent sexist attitudes will begin rearing their ugly heads if Hillary gets the nom and wins the presidency. Sexism will be just as in fashion as racism was and still is this time around. There is enough hate and resentment in the white brain for everyone who isn't WASPM.

  •  You do realize you're posting this in a... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    amyzex, Victor Ward, chrisculpepper

    ...blogging community where at least two out of three of the following realities: (veiled) austerity and racism, as well as political polarization, divide members (even here, and in the Democratic Party, as a whole), too.

    Many/most centrist and rightwing Democrats support the veiled austerity supported by the current administration; this includes virtually unchallenged support for corporations and related imperialist policies that almost always adversely affect voters (and citizens of other countries), of all types. Often it's to the point where rightwing and centrist Dems accuse liberal Democrats, en masse, of being racists and or "Naderite Libertarians" when, for most of those being called names, nothing could be further from the truth.

    U.S. corporatism and imperialism are, by definition, racist.

    Although, in this day and age, economic factors are put forth by the status quo to obfuscate those greater truths, as well. This is also known as "inverted totalitarianism" (and/or "managed democracy"), as harsh as that term might appear to those that are unfamiliar with its actual, underlying definition.

    Kind of like the communications ploy used in labeling torture as "enhanced interrogration," in fact! (Or, a myriad of other issues: i.e.--"income inequality" is now referenced as "opportunity," for fear of many Republicans and Democrats speaking the truth and referencing the underlying racism that is directly associated with it.) It is what it is. No matter how often too many, even here, may claim it is not.

    IMHO, we need to strip out the bullshit from the conversation and speak of WHAT IS.

    "I always thought if you worked hard enough and tried hard enough, things would work out. I was wrong." --Katharine Graham

    by bobswern on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 12:46:58 PM PDT

    •  Wholin's work is great (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      There is a great book Authoritarianism and Polarization which has some great analysis of data regarding Hillary's supporters during 2008 and their center right orientation, higher levels of racial animus, and conservatism.

      The relationship between neoliberalism and white supremacy is deep. Goldberg's recent work on that topic is very illuminating.

      •  It's truly GREAT to "hear" you acknowledging this! (0+ / 0-)

        It reminds me why I've had you on my "Follow List" for a few years now!

        Thank you Chauncey, "for all you do!"

        "I always thought if you worked hard enough and tried hard enough, things would work out. I was wrong." --Katharine Graham

        by bobswern on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 12:59:34 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  why do many racists appear to reject neoliberalism (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        The relationship between neoliberalism and white supremacy is deep.
        Obviously they reject the welfare state out of the belief that people of color are the primary (if not sole) beneficiaries of it, but from my admittedly limited experience it does not follow that they support the rest of the neoliberal program.  I've seen pretty lucid and passionate criticisms of financialization, globalization, and the corruption of government, only at the last minute to see it robotically blamed on Jews and [white] "liberals" - in their world, people of color seem to always an instrument but never the agent.  

        Domestic politics is the continuation of civil war by other means.

        by Visceral on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 02:09:38 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Is it your position (0+ / 0-)

    that due to the Obama presidency and the Great Recession, the average white American is more racist than he or she was ten years ago?  You are predicting that they will become more racist still.  Or is this an oversimplification?

    The Stars and Bars and the red swastika banner are both offerings to the same barbaric god.

    by amyzex on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 12:47:49 PM PDT

    •  the data suggests that there has been an increase (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      poco, Larsstephens, chrisculpepper

      in white racial resentment and old fashioned racism in this time period among some white voters. resource scarcity will only make matters worse.

    •  I am 55, white and if anything the last 10 years.. (21+ / 0-)

      ... have made me much more vehemently (on the verge of violently) ANTI-REPUBLICAN.

      It is the policies of the Republic Party which have destroyed my career, eliminated my job, destroyed my net worth, incinerated my retirement and condemned me to a death in poverty indentured by health-care costs.

      OF COURSE the GOP has been shot through with racism since the 1960s when they opened their arms wide to take in the Dixiecrats essentially booted out of the Democratic Party in the wake of the Civil Rights Act.

      OF COURSE that racism has been ginned up 1000% by the ascension of Barack Obama.

      As a middle-aged, middle-class (before my GOP-engineered economic destruction) white male, racism did not really have a huge effect on MY life.

      I always liked to think that as an enlightened child of the Sixties, I had a good tolerant attitude toward racial matters. In high school, guess what: 'Some Of My Best Friends Were Black.'

      But as I moved toward adulthood I realized I was nowhere near as tolerant as I thought I was, and also that the effects of racism upon me individually were not tremendously significant.

      HOWEVER ...

      As the adoption over the years by the Republic Party of increasingly blatant appeals to raw racism, along with economic warfare designed to destroy the lower and middle classes (i.e., me) it became more and more obvious:

      The inextricable connection between the Republic Party and racism CANNOT be publicly overemphasized or overstated. The Republic Party must be attacked and asaulted on EVERY possible basis, including racism.

      The Republic Party, especially its particularly virulent parasite organism of the ignorant racist teabaggers, as currently constiuted, must be defeated, demolished and destroyed for the sake of the future of the United States of America. It must be eradicated from our landscape BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

  •  Race's Most Powerful Utility is to Mute the Bully (4+ / 0-)


    A Black man in the White House is so "obviously" alien, so easily portrayed as Other, that great swaths of the people will not, do not, listen to his words.

    I think this more than any other aspect of the man is the key for the rightwing. They've made it so that there is not only nothing he can say, there is literally nothing he is saying to 40% of the country.

    Race as you say isn't the purpose for ownership taking over the country, robbing the people blind and stripping them of power, but it's a powerful motivating tool they can leverage.

    And one of its farther reaching consequences is the disappearing in plain sight of a historic leading figure.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 01:36:19 PM PDT

  •  I'm a huge Obama supporter (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    but sometimes I wonder if his election was good for America, especially in a time of crisis.

     Obama exposed a dark side of America that we thought was gone (or at least dormant).


    •  "Sunlight" is very revealing. I think it will take (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      time before the judgement of good thing/bad thing can really be made.  The long-range consequences of exposing that "dark-side of America" have to be seen.

      Robber Baron "ReTHUGisms": John D. Rockefeller -"The way to make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets"; Jay Gould -"I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half."

      by ranton on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 02:37:48 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Click here for the mobile view of the site