Skip to main content

A little late, but I caught a glimpse of CNN while I was working and I've been all night waiting to type this.
A CNN talking head (I don't know which one, and, really, who cares) stated that naming the officer that shot Brown would "set a bad precedent", forcing authorities to reveal the names of officers whose victims were shot for legitimate reasons.

I'm calling bullshit. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

Leaving aside the idea that maybe there ARE no legitimate reasons for shooting a perp other that "I was pinned down by automatic fire, his friends were coming, and a school bus had just turned the corner . . ."

Leaving aside the idea that legitimate shootings and illegitimate shootings are somehow the same in the eyes of the law, the public, and the media, and cannot be separated,. . .

Leaving aside the question of why would we need the naming of this particular officer to set a precedent at all . . .

What's wrong with having the public know the names of officers who shoot people, rightly or wrongly? THEY'RE OUR AGENTS! They work for US! We should have the right to monitor their work, evaluate their efficiency, and remove any who don't shape up.

Maybe the actions that have resulted in them fearing for their lives if their identities are revealed, are actions they should not be taking.

Has anyone on CNN considered that?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site