Skip to main content

Rich "Sparkle Pants" Lowry, National Review editor, Fox News contributor and President emeritus of the Sarah Palin Fan Club, seems bent on proving how strict adherence to a paleo-conservative diet can have deleterious effects on a young man's maturation, intelligence and judgment.

One of Lowry's thought leader gigs last week was co-hosting a panel discussion on immigration policy at Jim DeMint's Temple of Conservative Orthodoxy, the Heritage Foundation.

This was the panel's stated assignment:

The crisis at our southern border is intensifying. President Obama’s failure to faithfully administer our immigration laws has handcuffed our border agents, jeopardizing the lives of those we entrust to maintain security and stability in the area. Just as troubling is the unprecedented wave of unaccompanied minors crossing the border from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala.

Unfortunately administrative amnesty and talk of comprehensive immigration reform have only escalated the situation. So, what steps should we take to alleviate this crisis?

Of course, many conservative lawmakers, addressing the recent crisis of refugee children at the border, have already come up with fresh new approaches to "The New Politics of Immigration," stopping short of actual legislation, of course.

Keep going, there's more . . .

For example, I'm still having nightmares in which I stumble upon Louie Gohmert, Glenn Beck and Dana Loesch, in night vision goggles, tramping around in the desert on a "coyote" hunt. Others suggested loading all new arrivals onto commercial planes with a cost-effective one-way ticket back to the homes from which they had sought asylum.  Still others who are "real doctors in real life" decided that a little public health-scare might be in order and warned their unsuspecting constituents to take precautions against Ebola virus, leprosy and lice riding into town on Guatemalan niños.

But the Heritage Foundation is a capital-T Think Tank and takes a far more serious and scholarly approach to conservative policy prescriptions.  And, so it is that a slightly tetchy Rich Lowry lost his pedantic cool and let loose with this manly sentiment:

The next time I hear a Republican strategist or a Republican politician say that there are jobs that Americans won't do, that person should be shot, he should be hanged, he should be wrapped in a carpet and thrown in the Potomac River.  You know that's what they did to Rasputin, I think it was a different river. But let me tell you, it worked.
Well.  That sort of statement certainly should encourage a dynamic exchange of ideas on immigration in our national discourse.  I'd be surprised if Lowry doesn't also fancy himself a proud American supporter of the First Amendment . . . which, as far as I know, does not include murder -- however expeditious -- as an acceptable remedy for opposing viewpoints.

At any rate, having said all of that, Lowry must have been annoyed by the cool kids laughing at him because he was inspired to print a brief defensive clarification and appeal to Republican Purity, to wit:

At the NR/Heritage event on immigration yesterday, I said the next Republican politician or consultant who says that there are “jobs that Americans won’t do” should be shot, hanged, and wrapped in a carpet and thrown in the Potomac River.

Not only is it not true that there are jobs that Americans won’t do, it is a sentiment that betrays contempt for those Americans who do the kind of jobs they aren’t supposed to be doing. So, it is the last thing anyone associated with what should be a party of work should say.

That might have put an end to the incident, but, unfortunately, Lowry has a marked propensity for shooting himself in the foot even in the midst of a glorious big boy moment.

Show you what I mean . . .in the statement above, Lowery substantiated his point that it is "not true that there are jobs that Americans won’t do" by linking to a Breitbart.com article which cites a study published by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) which sounds impressive but is actually -- like its sister organizations the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and NumbersUSA -- all parts of a network of fronts for dispensing some of the darker musings of John Tanton, a firm believer in "better living through eugenics."

The Southern Poverty Law Center describes Tanton as "the 'puppeteer' of the nativist movement and a man with deep racist roots."

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that all white supremacists are always necessarily wrong or more inclined to fudge facts to support their cause than others.  But it's a pretty well-documented fact that this particular operator, and all of his "puppets" do.

John Tanton is a punchline in political science academic circles, making Lowry either very clueless, very lazy or cynically opportunistic, judging by his source material.  On this particular topic, most mainstream economists who concern themselves with immigration effects agree with Lowry that "immigrants do not do jobs that natives won't do" because the statement, itself, is misleading; but that acknowledgment does not lead them to many conservatives' conclusion that further restricting immigration is desirable to protect our economy.

Actually, the premise that restricted immigration benefits the American economy has been recently tested in the "laboratories of Democracy" and found to be a "man made disaster."  In 2011, the Alabama state legislature proudly passed HB 56 which was touted as the nation's harshest anti-immigrant law, which resulted in a mass exodus of immigrant workers in Alabama followed by an economic trainwreck for Alabama's $5 billion/year agriculture business.  Georgia did pretty much the same, with the same result.

That story is a complex and fascinating one and was very well-covered by Paul Reyes of Mother Jones.  It's a long-read that's well worth the time.

Looking back on Alabama's disaster, economist Dr. Benjamin Powell, put the reality of the situation very succinctly:

Immigrants tend to be either high-skilled or low-skilled; Americans tend to be more toward the middle of the skill distribution. This means that immigrants aren’t substitutes for American labor but, instead, free up American labor to do jobs where it is more productive. That’s one reason economists don’t find that immigration depresses the wages of the native-born.

As a number of economists have pointed out, immigrants don’t “do jobs Americans won’t do.” They do jobs that wouldn’t exist if the immigrants weren’t there to do them. By making life harder for a population of undocumented immigrants, the state government has ensured that future generations of Alabamians will be poorer than they would otherwise be.

The bottom line is that, at least on this issue, Rich Lowry has been an irresponsible, lazy editor whose word is, unfortunately, taken as gospel by hundreds of thousands of Americans and taken seriously by many unserious lawmakers.

William Buckley must be spinning in his grave if he knows anything about what this fatuous poseur has done to his National Review and probably wouldn't complain if we wrapped Lowry up in a carpet and shipped him elsewhere.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Excellent job channeling Hunter. :-) (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bluefin, BelgianBastard

    Excellent job channeling

    Hunter. :-)

  •  Did her really say this? REALLY? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BetteNoir, Bluefin

    " . . . associated with what should be a party of work should say."

    W takes more than a a HALF-TERM of vacation (880 days) and Lowry calls it the "party of work?"

    When has the GOP been known by that appellation?  

    A word to the wise is sufficient. Republicans need at least a paragraph.

    by d3clark on Sun Aug 24, 2014 at 01:00:10 PM PDT

    •  Seriously . . . (4+ / 0-)

      that bit about the "party of work" made me spew coffee this morning.  It's more disturbing than the Rasputin daydream.

      What fresh hell is this? D. Parker

      by BetteNoir on Sun Aug 24, 2014 at 01:11:06 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The GOP, an appalling appallation... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nocynicism, BelgianBastard

      Name that trainwreck.

      When has the GOP been known by that appellation?  
      Like the rest, I about choked when I read: "a party of work". Bwahahahahah...'piece of work' fits better on those pRickheads.

      Like into the Puerto Rican Trench?:

      ...wouldn't complain if we wrapped Lowry up in a carpet and shipped him elsewhere.
      .

      "The church of life is not in a building, it is the open sky, the surrounding ocean, the beautiful soil"...George Helm, 1/1977

      by Bluefin on Sun Aug 24, 2014 at 02:27:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Now, let's not be too hard on the GOP... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BetteNoir

    In recent years they have demonstrated a remarkable drive, focus and work ethic.  Take for example their dedication to the repeal of the ACA.  Republicans could have voted a mere 5, 10, or even 20 times to repeal the ACA.  But, no!  They just keep pushing doggedly ahead, despite court rulings or the popularity of the ACA among their constituents.  And, what about their drive to find the truth about "Benghazi"?  No matter how much actual evidence they have that says there was no cover-up, they will not stop looking.  They could have 2, 3, 4 hearings on the matter.  Now that's devotion!  And, let's not forget their hard work in shutting down the government.  And, all of that while still getting paid.  Yes, they are certainly among the most dedicated of public servants.  We should remember to thank them at the next election!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site