No one was trying to use a public toilet because gender, and yet a male took sexual advantage of a minor female. (see Ted Cruz and the fear for his daughters).
Young Conservatives apparently think that “Transgender people have always been around. Suddenly, during an election year bathrooms have become problematic and (a) political issue. Democrats are manipulative cultural terrorists and are trying to eliminate the existence of gender. “ Gender apparently is also stochastic, unlike sexuality.
However, in this case, the court found that an (unimpeachable) male apparently did not have sex with an unconscious female, despite, stuff like evidence (see rape kits ignored in other jurisdictions).
And the market for roofies will skyrocket in the Prairies since in some jurisdictions, Justice there is apparently blind drunk.
And RWNJs sign petitions protesting box store restroom policies that represent no clear or present danger. The American Family Association’s petition says that Target is openly inviting sexual predators to take advantage of their stores’ customers, asking “Where do you think predators are going to go?”
The place they seem to be going are either the inside of automobiles or going over the river and through the woods to grandmother’s house. Just go take the Sodom exit to Gomorrah.
An Oklahoma court has stunned local prosecutors with a declaration that state law doesn’t criminalize oral sex with a victim who is completely unconscious.
The case involved allegations that a 17-year-old boy assaulted a girl, 16, after volunteering to give her a ride home. The two had been drinking in a Tulsa park with a group of friends when it became clear that the girl was badly intoxicated. Witnesses recalled that she had to be carried into the defendant’s car. Another boy, who briefly rode in the car, recalled her coming in and out of consciousness.
The boy later brought the girl to her grandmother’s house. Still unconscious, the girl was taken to a hospital, where a test put her blood alcohol content above .34. She awoke as staff were conducting a sexual assault examination.
Tests would later confirm that the young man’s DNA was found on the back of her leg and around her mouth. The boy claimed to investigators that the girl had consented to performing oral sex. The girl said she didn’t have any memories after leaving the park. Tulsa County prosecutors charged the young man with forcible oral sodomy.
But the trial judge dismissed the case. And the appeals court ruling, on 24 March, affirmed that prosecutors could not apply the law to a victim who was incapacitated by alcohol.
“Forcible sodomy cannot occur where a victim is so intoxicated as to be completely unconscious at the time of the sexual act of oral copulation,” the decision read. Its reasoning, the court said, was that the statute listed several circumstances that constitute force, and yet was silent on incapacitation due to the victim drinking alcohol. “We will not, in order to justify prosecution of a person for an offense, enlarge a statute beyond the fair meaning of its language.”
www.theguardian.com/...