well, actually it went up 3 ½ hours ago, in a piece titled Report: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton
They are reporting on what is in this report from Who What Why.
Quoting from the Hill piece:
In a report published Monday, the website said the girl who exchanged the messages with Weiner was closer to 17 and not 15, as initial reports said. That also puts her above the age of consent in North Carolina, which is 16.
In addition, she and her family were also not Clinton supporters, as the girl claimed in a letter published by BuzzFeed, according to social media posts unearthed by the website. The report also says the girl initiated the contact with Weiner and then sought advice from a GOP figure behind "prior efforts to harm Weiner and other Democrats."
The website suggests this could mean that Weiner was the target of a politically motivated plot.
And the Hill also offers this from the website:
It says that the victim celebrated Trump's victory on social media, that her father is a registered Republican and that her mother tweeted derisively about the Black Lives Matter movement.
The report also added that Chuck Johnson, a conservative writer, was one of the individuals who connected the girl to The Daily Mail.
Remember that The Hill is widely read in DC, which will give far more visibility to the underlying report.
I draw no conclusions, but because The Hill is reporting it, I thought it worth sharing.
I note that in my work with male politicians I have always warned them to beware of certain things, including women (of any age) who make themselves available.