Citizen Surveillance and Personal Data Privacy
by retired
Thu Mar 10, 2005 at 12:57:24 PM PDT
-----U.S. Privacy Protection Study Commission, 1977
- retired's diary :: ::

-----U.S. Privacy Protection Study Commission, 1977
These "intelligence fusion centers" are being established to process information from the federal government as well as gather threat information from within state and local jurisdictions.
The concept of the intelligence fusion centers is a real leap forward and could open new opportunities for systems integrators, said Jeff Vining, research vice president for market research firm Gartner Inc. of Stamford, Conn.
"Intelligence fusion centers are red hot for state and local governments, which are becoming not just consumers of intelligence information but also collectors of it," he said.
Companies positioned well for this work are those that have federal defense and intelligence experience, such as EDS Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp., homeland security experts said. Contractors with expertise in the criminal justice information-sharing arena, including Accenture Ltd., BearingPoint Inc. of McLean, Va., and Unisys Corp., also are likely to pursue opportunities.
Political groups are finding out what kind of car their prospective supporters drive, how much they earn, what sort of neighborhood they live in and what magazines they read.
They may not know how individuals voted in the last election, but they do know who showed up at the polls and whether they are registered with a particular party -- strong indicators of how they are likely to vote in the November election, experts say.
"It's pretty scary, the stuff you can get on people," said Robert Richman, founder of the liberal campaign consulting firm Grassroots Solutions.
[...]
On a recent afternoon, company President Dean Aristotle Phillips searched the voter database for Democratic women between 35 and 45 years old in Fairfield County, Connecticut, who have indicated they don't want to receive telemarketing calls.
The computer returned 3,004 matches, with a long list of personal details: name, address, phone number, income level, whether they have children, household size, whether they have an "ethnic" surname. Contributions to political candidates, arts organizations, environmental groups and other interest groups were also noted.
Most valuable is the voter history, which reveals how many elections the person has participated in since 1984. Reliable voters are especially prized, Phillips said.
But data protection laws mean the political parties will have much
less freedom to exploit information about voters' personal details
than their American counterparts.
The use of consumer data as a political marketing tool is still in its
infancy in the UK, but both the main parties are studying commercially
available information as a way of targeting swing voters.
Imagine those intimate records turned over to the government for a wide-ranging investigation headed by a prosecutor who is an ardent opponent of abortion.
That's just what will happen in Kansas, if state Attorney General Phill Kline has his way. The prosecutor is demanding the records of 90 women and girls who obtained late-term abortions at two Kansas clinics. The clinics are battling a local judge's order to turn over the records. They've asked the Kansas Supreme Court to reject or narrow the order.
But students and parents, who weren't told about the RFID chips until they complained, are upset over what they say are surreptitious tactics the school used to implement the program. [...]
ChoicePoint Inc., Alpharetta, GA, keeps billions of data points on businesses and nearly every adult in the United States, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, credit reports and criminal records.
The company's ChoicePoint Precision Marketing division maintains the MarketView database of 220 million consumers, including demographic, lifestyle, credit and financial information from multiple sources. The division also provides analytical, telemarketing, creative, e-mail append, lettershop and lead generation services to direct marketers. Other ChoicePoint divisions offer services to government and law enforcement and provide background checks for employers and insurance companies. [...]
(Note that Choicepoint is also the firm retained by NYC to identify WTC victims' remains using DNA profiles. Now conveniently and somewhat suspiciously, 1,100 victims will forever remain unidentified as the effort is cancelled.)
Soma said private companies such as ChoicePoint can legally collect and swap many private and public records that the government cannot. Hiring ChoicePoint allows the government to sift through records it would not be able to on its own.
The breaches occurred at the company's recently acquired Seisint Inc. subsidiary, a Florida firm that sells data amassed from extensive public records searches to law enforcement agencies, businesses, private investigators and others.
[...]
LexisNexis Group acquired Seisint last summer for $775 million in cash. At the time, Seisint was best known as the company behind a counter-terrorism supercomputer called the Matrix, which enabled law enforcement and intelligence authorities to blend investigative files with billions of public records.
Gratuitiously, and rather insultingly as if we need the slap in the face at just how pervasive the risks are, the Washington Post article throws in a bit about a recent credit card breach by shoe retailer DSW. More on DSW here, with cases of fraud emerging from the breach.
In other words, nearly three-quarters of customer info farmed out by Wells Fargo, the nation's fourth-largest bank, could be in danger of falling into the wrong hands.
(See also Accenture wins $10bn Homeland Security gig)
The Law: This is but a mere snapshot of how we lost our traction on that proverbial slippery slope, with the foxes guarding the henhouse.
However, Trans Union - one of the big 3 credit reporting agencies - lost several cases in 2002, and was ordered the highest payout to date ($5.3million) for damages suffered as a result of erroneous data in consumer credit reports. TU was expected to appeal the decision.
Selected consumer actions:
The case could set a precedent that would help establish better standards for how data brokers secure and sell consumers' private information and lead to regulations that would hold them accountable for lax data protection.
I'm still adding info to this so bear with me. Add your items and concerns to this list to make it as broad as possible without losing sight of the big picture of the danger of government and corporate surveillance of citizens.