Do we really need this sort of drivel in the press?
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/11/opinion/11DOWD.html?ex=1079586000&en=820f30238756c52d&ei=5
062&partner=GOOGLE
I understand she may have been playing somewhat tongue and cheek, but for heaven's sake, this is the play stuff of Rush and Sean Hannity, not fricken Maureen Dowd of the New York Times. We have a very serious election with very serious answers, and she's really concerned with his forehead?
Maureen, shame on you. You should take a hike. You've lost alot of respect in my book for this drivel and pop-journalism. Absolutely pathetic.