Sure, he doesn't seem like the hitchin kind, but we all settle down at some point. Should Gannon (or as I like to call him, Fred Garvin, Male prostitute) have less of a right to marry then a heterosexual prostitute? If so, does that mean that being gay is worse than being a prostitute? I am confused. We must get the right-wing to help us out on these issues. They have moral clarity to spare.
Seriously. The Republicans party has some profound inconsitencies on homosexuality. It is our duty to point them out and exploit them for political gain. They can not continue to get both the anti-gay religious zealot vote and the, OK with homosexuality but otherwise conservative vote. Make their leaders take a stand and offend part of their consituency.