Read this
NY Times Article on yesterday's caucuses and tell me it isn't biased.
It says over and over again that Washington and Michigan used to be Dean strongholds, but that Kerry "romped" big victories. Never once does it mention that Dean did better in both states than polls anticipated.
Unlike some Dean supporters, I don't believe in media conspiracies, but I do think that this article went out of its way to snub Dean and congratulate Kerry. That's poor journalism.