We have heard it over and over again. That Muslims don't condemn terrorism. Forget the fact that a simple google search will get you tons of hits with Muslims condemning terrorism all over the world: scholars and laymen.

This site contains a list of many scholarly statements and views from around the world.

CAIR site has 68 pages of Muslims around the world condemning terrorism
http://www.cair.com/...

Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have signed an on-line petition. The "Not in the Name of Islam" petition
http://www.cair-net.org/...

It appears that Representative (and Senate candidate) Mark Udall will be introducing a resolution on Monday which would seek to condemn Rush Limbaugh's obscene attack on the integrity and patriotism of American service members.

I wouldn't expect this resolution to pass, as I don't expect many -- if any -- Republicans to vote for it. But from my perspective, the point of this resolution isn't to receive a majority vote, or even really to condemn Limbaugh.  After all, a great number of us in the Democratic Party don't believe that the United States Congress should be in the business of "condemning" the speech of American citizens. As I see it, the point of this exercise is: 1) to highlight the hypocrisy of those Republicans who would vote to condemn the speech of MoveOn, but not that of America's Favorite Chickenhawk -- even as he smeared rank-and-file service members -- and 2) to make sure that those Democrats who saw fit to publicly condemn their ally on the floor of Congress are willing to do the same to a man who despises them and the Democratic Party.

In light of those goals, I hope that all of us in the netroots will honor and respect the decision of those Democrats who choose to vote against both the MoveOn and Limbaugh resolutions.  They're taking a responsible, ethical, and consistent position.  As for Democrats who voted for the MoveOn resolution, but vote against the Limbaugh resolution?  Well, let's just hope that there aren't any.