Daily Kos

Tag: Jim Webb

Jim Webb for Vice President

Sat May 17, 2008 at 07:46:39 AM PDT

Senator James Webb of Virginia is the best possible Vice Presidential Democratic nominee due to his military experience.

He could serve as a shield and sword against John McCain and Republican "Swiftboat-like" attacks on Barack Obama's patriotism.

A 1968 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, Webb served as a Marine Corps infantry officer until 1972, and is a highly decorated Vietnam War combat veteran.  Webb served as the first Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, then as Secretary of the Navy.

 title=
h/t to Tuscany

Misleading statistics - Appalachia

Sat May 17, 2008 at 05:11:45 AM PDT

We have had quite a few analyses of how Obama did in Appalachia, and why.  But consider this:

Clinton said in her victory speech on Tuesday night that no Democrat has won the White House since 1916 without taking West Virginia. True. But they all could have won without it. The margins of victory in those races ranged from 23 to 515 electoral votes. West Virginia has five.

That quote is from Skirting Appalachia, an op ed in today's NY Times by Charles Blow that I believe is well worth the brief time to read, and to examine the maps he provides.  Come along for a further examination.

Obama VP and Cabinet

Fri May 16, 2008 at 02:13:23 PM PDT

Thoughts on Obama's pick for VP and Cabinet.

Poll

Who should be Obama's VP

33%94 votes
66%183 votes

| 277 votes | Vote | Results

It's Jim Webb!!! Take it to the bank

Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:10:20 PM PDT

Jim Webb, former Navy Secretary, Aggressive Agent of Change in US foreign Policy, Son of the South, is the Vice President. He'll carry Virginia decisively, help us carry West Virginia decisively and Stay on Defense for our first Intellectual President of the 21st Century.

Veepstakes: Should Age Be a Factor? W/ Poll

Wed May 14, 2008 at 06:47:47 PM PDT

I have seen continuous discussions on this site about who should be Obama's vice president, but little discussion over the AGE of the candidates. Perhaps this is because of the false assumption that we need a seasoned veteran to offset Obama's perceived inexperience. However, I strongly believe that if we truly want a long lasting progressive majority, we really need to  take age into consideration. We need somebody that both has experience, can be perceived as a change agent, and can continue leading the progressive majority after eight years of the Obama presidency. So, let us take a look at the age of the perspective candidates (I will also give my personal analysis):

Poll

After taking Age into Consideration, Who Should be Obama's VP?

18%20 votes
11%13 votes
2%3 votes
12%14 votes
10%12 votes
4%5 votes
1%2 votes
2%3 votes
0%1 votes
0%0 votes
0%1 votes
3%4 votes
3%4 votes
14%16 votes
10%12 votes

| 110 votes | Vote | Results

5 p.m. PDT Daily Open Obama V.P. Thread #5 (w/poll)

Wed May 14, 2008 at 04:59:24 PM PDT

Wow, what a great, rousing speech for Obama by John Edwards just now.  I think it was one of his best, and he seemed genuinely quite comfortable to be there with that crowd.

Edwards is still my second choice for vice presidential running mate for Obama, after Fmr. Sen. Sam Nunn (GA), but that doesn't mean I'd be disappointed to see him get it. He has a lot to offer, even if people want to say he lost last time and couldn't even carry his home state. Like Nunn, he helps in places outside his home state, and might even help carry it with a strong candidate like Obama at the top of the ticket.

This is the fifth edition of this Daily Open Obama V.P. Thread. It's had a few theme polls and a few just straight up, with different combinations of candidates to vote for. Overall, 33 candidates have appeared at different times, Republican and Democrat, male and female, married and single, black, white and Latino and from all regions.

(continued below the fold)

Poll

Who should be Barack Obama's vice presidential running mate?

1%4 votes
6%16 votes
1%3 votes
20%51 votes
4%10 votes
2%6 votes
2%7 votes
1%3 votes
3%9 votes
0%2 votes
12%30 votes
19%48 votes
1%3 votes
18%46 votes
4%11 votes

| 249 votes | Vote | Results

McCain & the Republican leadership compromise the troops & first responders

Wed May 14, 2008 at 04:15:28 PM PDT

Earlier today, the Politico reported that:

With Memorial Day around the corner, Sen. John McCain and his allies are reaching out to Virginia Democratic Sen. Jim Webb in the hope of finding a compromise on a GI Bill that would eliminate a potential embarrassment for the Arizona Republican’s presidential campaign.

But that spirit of compromise lasted as long as a John McCain straight talking talking point, because:

Republicans took the opportunity of a bipartisan bill this morning to try and attach a proposal by Arizona Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee, that would somewhat improve GI Bill benefits currently offered to American service members.

First, let's look at the difference between the McCain bill:

Under McCain's plan, the GI Bill benefit for active duty soldiers who pay the $1,200 enrollment fee would jump from a max of $1,100 per month to $1,500 and to $2,000 for service members with 12 years of service.

...versus the Webb bill:

Increased educational benefits would be available to all members of the military who have served on active duty since September 11, 2001, including activated reservists and National Guard. To qualify, veterans must have served at least three to thirty-six months of qualified active duty, beginning on or after September 11, 2001.  [...]

Benefits provided under the bill would allow veterans pursuing an approved program of education to receive payments covering the established charges of their program, up to the cost of the most expensive instate public school, plus a monthly stipend equivalent to housing costs in their area. The bill would allow additional payments for tutorial assistance, as well as licensure and certification tests.

Bear in mind that the Webb bill has overwhelming support in both the Senate and the House, and has been endorsed by every major veterans group.  The McCain bill is supported by the White House, John McCain, and a few dead-enders in the Republican leadership.  

So, who did the Republicans try to throw under the bus today by attaching this poison pill?  First Responders.  Yes, in an effort to "eliminate a potential embarrassment" for John McCain, the Republican leadership willingly derailed a bill that would have provided collective bargaining rights for firemen, policemen and emergency medical technicians.  Said Ted Kennedy:

We have seen this parliamentary gimmick that has taken place offered by the Republican leadership that is a slap in the face to every firefighter and police officer and first responder in the country. [...]

We're saying to the firefighters of this nation and to the police officers of this nation and the first responders of the nation: Your interest, the safety and security of our communities across the nation, should be put aside in favor of some political gimmick by the Republican leader here in the United States Senate.

We're all used to the Republican Party using "support the troops" as a slogan, but it's the first time that they've attempted to screw over the men and women who risk their lives every day, both at home and abroad, at the same time.  Thankfully, this maneuver went down in flames, 42-55, but it should serve as a lesson as to the true nature of the Republican leadership's idea of "compromise."

My argument for Jim Webb as Veep

Wed May 14, 2008 at 02:04:47 PM PDT

I have no idea whom Obama will consider.  Nor do I know for certain that Webb would consider an offer if made, although I believe that he might well.

And before I start, I will disclose that (a) I was on the edge of the group that persuaded him to run for the Senate (although I played little part in the actual persuasion; (b) before the primary I had a conversation with a key advisor that if Jim were to win the Senate seat he would be on people's VP list; (c) Some of what I am going to write here I have actually discussed with the Senator, and he did not cut me off; (d) I am not personally close with the Senator - there are things with which I disagree, but overall I consider him to have as much integrity and intelligence as any elected official I have ever known, and that combination by itself would be sufficient for me to strongly advocate his being considered for VP.  

So if you care what I think, please keep reading below the fold.  If you don't, if you have mentally rejected Jim Webb because (a) he was once a Republican, or (b) he voted the wrong way on some particular issue (FISA, Immigration, etc), or you think because of a headline on an article written decades ago he is a sexist, then I URGE you to keep reading because you really do not understand the man.

OpenThread: Edwards? Endorsement @ 6:30pm; Jim Webb's Book, Unity Fund & a SD

Wed May 14, 2008 at 12:10:39 PM PDT

Big Endorsement due at 6:30 pm tonight.

A big national endorsement that Obama will unveil at 6:30 pm ET tonight.... a conspicuous Clinton deserter, perhaps? I don't know.

I think Mark Halperin knows...  but is dansac in the know?  This one would take the cake

Marc Ambinder through really has the pieces put together. All signs point to Edwards.

Huffington Post nearly makes it official.

Poll

Which Veep Candidate best appeals to working Class whites

45%918 votes
1%35 votes
4%98 votes
7%150 votes
18%382 votes
2%54 votes
19%397 votes

| 2034 votes | Vote | Results

I think we have a VP winner

Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:54:38 AM PDT

and it' Jim Webb. Why you ask?

Poll: Everyone Supports a New GI Bill. NO COMPROMISE

Wed May 14, 2008 at 08:29:47 AM PDT

Boy, you can't get any more slam dunk poll findings than this.  The Campaign for a New GI Bill released a new poll yesterday that shows that the American public overwhelmingly supports a new GI Bill.

Among the findings:

81% of Americans say that veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan are not getting enough support in transitioning back to civilian life.

91% of Americans support providing these veterans with a funded college education for their service.

While 85% of Americans believe that the original GI Bill of 1944 was fair to returning World War II veterans, 67% say that the current GI Bill is not fair and 3 out of 4 say that it doesn’t do enough for veterans.

More than 8 of 10 Americans support a comprehensive 21st Century GI Bill.

91% of Americans agree that the government should make good on its promise to help veterans get a college education and that we should reward current heroes like we rewarded those in the past

83% of Americans believe that a new 21st Century GI Bill will benefit America. (94% of Americans say that the original GI Bill was a good idea, and 91% believe it benefited America).

Poll

Do you support a REAL 21st Century GI Bill?

98%74 votes
1%1 votes

| 75 votes | Vote | Results

5 p.m. PDT Daily Open Obama V.P. Thread #4: Defense/Nat'l Security Experience Edition (w/poll)

Tue May 13, 2008 at 05:04:51 PM PDT

Welcome back for yet more Obama v.p. speculation. I know it can get annoying for non-addicts. But that's part of the point. If we're annoying enough, perhaps Obama will announce early, which I believe would be very good for his campaign.

I've set the threshold fairly low for defense and/or national security experience, ranging from just a short time on related House or Senate committees to unquestioned political expertise, from solid work on individual related issues to entire distinguished military careers.

I have only listed highlights of related experience; if you would like to get more specific in the comments in support of your favorites or against your least favorites, please feel free. I like most of the listed choices in the poll this time, and have included a few more names being mentioned recently for possible Obama running mates. I will note my reservations below the fold.

(continued below the fold)

Poll

Who should be Barack Obama's vice presidential running mate?

2%4 votes
10%15 votes
0%1 votes
2%4 votes
0%1 votes
7%11 votes
8%13 votes
4%6 votes
4%6 votes
0%0 votes
19%29 votes
5%8 votes
21%31 votes
1%2 votes
10%16 votes

| 147 votes | Vote | Results

Webb "not really interested" in VP slot

Tue May 13, 2008 at 02:43:08 PM PDT

There's an interesting bit of reporting over at The Hill today, where they got 97 out of the 100 senators to state with whether or not they'd be willing to be vice-president, if asked to do so. That they got so many senators to go on the record about that is, in itself, pretty newsworthy, but the stop-the-presses moment here is that some of the names you see mentioned the most (at least around here) in that context have demurred, with the biggest name being Jim Webb. (Whether that refusal is meaningful at this point is a whole 'nother question, but I'll leave that up to the reader to make that distinction.)

The Obama Dream Team

Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:22:52 AM PDT

Now that Hillary Clinton is in the rear-view mirror, Barack Obama has his work cut out for him.

High on his agenda should be putting together a remarkable cabinet. After seeing the debacle of the Bush administration, one of the strongest arguments for a Democratic president is the strength of the team he can assemble to do the real work of the Executive Branch.  

Here’s one man’s view of what the Obama Dream Team might look like:

5 p.m. PDT Daily Open Obama V.P. Thread #3 (w/poll)

Mon May 12, 2008 at 05:06:22 PM PDT

Welcome back for more Obama v.p. speculation. "Hardball" did a round with David Schuster today, including Chuck Hagel, Tim Kaine, my favorite Sam Nunn, Kathleen Sebelius, Ted Strickland, and Jim Webb, and their crazy "experts" agreed on Hagel with Strickland as runner-up (if you just go by their points of intersection as Matthews did).

Our last edition here yesterday was all women candidates, and interestingly, Sebelius won, as she did in Thread #1, with men and women in the poll.

I've tried to switch up the poll a bit today, including all of the Schuster group from "Hardball" today.

(continued below the fold)

Poll

Who should be Barack Obama's vice presidential running mate?

1%7 votes
0%1 votes
0%2 votes
3%16 votes
6%27 votes
11%50 votes
0%4 votes
8%38 votes
4%17 votes
4%18 votes
1%5 votes
0%4 votes
27%118 votes
6%29 votes
20%87 votes

| 423 votes | Vote | Results

Blue Dogs or Red Dogs, Part II

Mon May 12, 2008 at 08:05:38 AM PDT

Today is the day to take action on H.R. 5740.  As I outlined on Friday:

It's time to draw a line in the sand. There are forty-seven members of the Blue Dog Democrats, and we need to know which ones support the U.S. troops who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan and which ones agree with Rep. John Tanner that they are nothing more than deficit-enhancing debris. This is what Mr. Tanner had to say when announcing the plan by a segment of the Blue Dogs to block a vote on the GI Bill of Rights:

Some of us oppose creating a new entitlement program in an emergency spending bill, whether it’s butchers, bakers or candlestick-makers.

A group that has voted time after time to support George Bush's war, at a cost of over $500 billion dollars, now dismisses the men and women who risked their lives as candlestick-makers who don't deserve money to go to college? The Blue Dog's reason? Because their budgetary rule of pay-as-you-go has "been ignored one too many times." Yes, these champions of fiscal responsibility are fine with George Bush's twice-a-year $100 billion "supplementals," they are fine with billions going to Halliburton and Blackwater, but when it comes to providing a benefit to the people who fought in the war that the Blue Dogs supported, well, to hell with the troops.

This week House Democratic leaders will once again to try bring the Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 up for a vote and we need to know which Blue Dogs plan to join John "candlestick-maker" Tanner in blocking educational benefits for the men and women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.  

Bear in mind, the only reason to block this vote is because they are too cowardly to stand up and publicly oppose this bill.  If they don't want to support the troops, they should have the guts to come out and say so instead of trying to hide behind a procedural maneuver.  

So please, take a few minutes to call a Blue Dog and ask if they intend to block H.R. 5740 or if they will support educational assistance for veterans.  And tell them that supporting the troops isn't just a slogan...at least it shouldn't be.

And for more action items, go to Iraq & Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA).

Mike Arcuri (NY): (202) 225-3665
Joe Baca  (CA): (202) 225-6161
John Barrow  (GA): (202) 225-2823
Melissa Bean  (IL): (202) 225-3711
Marion Berry  (AR): (202) 225-4076
Sanford Bishop  (GA): (202) 225-3631
Dan Boren  (OK): (202) 225-2701
Leonard Boswell  (IA): (202) 225-3806
Allen Boyd  (FL): (202) 225-5235
Dennis Cardoza  (CA): (202) 225-6131
Christopher Carney  (PA): (202) 225-3731
Ben Chandler  (KY): (202) 225-4706
Jim Cooper  (TN): (202) 225-4311
Jim Costa  (CA): (202) 225-3341
Bud Cramer (AL): (202) 225-4801
Lincoln Davis  (TN): (202) 225-6831
Joe Donnelly  (IN): (202) 225-3915
Brad Ellsworth  (IN): (202) 225-4636
Gabrille Giffords  (AZ): (202) 225-2542
Kirsten Gillibrand  (NY): (202) 225-5614
Bart Gordon  (TN): (202) 225-4231
Jane Harman  (CA): (202) 225 8220
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin  (SD): (202) 225-2801
Baron Hill  (IN): (202) 225-5315
Tim Holden  (PA): (202) 225-5546
Steve Israel  (NY): (202)  225 3335
Nick Lampson  (TX): (202) 225-5951
Tim Mahoney  (FL): (202) 225-5792
Jim Marshall  (GA): (202) 225-6531
Jim Matheson  (UT): (202) 225-3011
Mike McIntyre  (NC): (202) 225-2731
Charlie Melancon  (LA): (202) 225-4031
Michael Michaud  (ME): (202) 225-6306
Dennis Moore  (KS): (202) 225-2865
Patrick Murphy  (PA): (202) 225-4276
Collin Peterson  (MN): (202) 225-2165
Earl Pomeroy  (ND): (202) 225-2611
Mike Ross  (AR): 1-800-223-2220
John Salazar  (CO): (202) 225-4761
Loretta Sanchez  (CA): (202) 225-2965
Adam Schiff  (CA): (202) 225-4176
David Scott  (GA): (202) 225-2939
Heath Shuler  (NC): (202) 225-6401
Zack Space  (OH): (202) 225-6265
John Tanner  (TN): (202) 225-4714
Gene Taylor  (MS): (202) 225-5772
Mike Thompson  (CA): (202) 225-3311
Charlie Wilson  (OH): (202) 225-5705

Novak: Hillary nixed for Veep; Strickland a possibility

Fri May 09, 2008 at 11:42:25 PM PDT

I don't put much stock in Robert Novak's claim that Michelle Obama has nixed the VP chances of Hillary Clinton.  However, his claim that Democratic Party insiders are pushing the candidacy of Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland is intruiging.

http://www.townhall.com/...

"Support is growing in Democratic ranks for Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland as vice president. He would bring to the ticket maturity (66 years old), experience (six terms in Congress) and moderation (rated "A" by the National Rifle Association). He is very popular in Ohio, a state Republicans must carry to elect a president."

5 p.m. Pacific Daily Open Obama V.P. Thread #1 (w/poll)

Fri May 09, 2008 at 05:01:20 PM PDT

There's been a lot of irresponsible, uninformed, baseless speculation about Barack Obama's pick for a vice presidential nominee around these parts lately; here's more!

Seriously, I hate to see all of these polls with Sen. Joe Biden (MBNA), Mayor Mike Bloomberg (NY), Gen. (Ret.) Wes Clark (AR), Sen. John Kerry (MA) and Gov. Bill Richardson (NM) on them, and Fmr. Sen. Sam Nunn (GA)--whom I consider the strongest possible choice, as well as the most likely--sadly left off.

I don't mind a little unreality in my wild rantings, but these are clearly a bridge too far.

(continued below the fold)

Poll

Who should be Barack Obama's vice presidential running mate?

2%8 votes
2%7 votes
0%1 votes
5%14 votes
5%15 votes
1%3 votes
6%17 votes
2%8 votes
2%7 votes
6%18 votes
4%13 votes
28%77 votes
2%6 votes
17%48 votes
11%30 votes

| 272 votes | Vote | Results


:: Next 18

Advertise on the Liberal Blog Advertising Network.

Hate ads? Subscribe.





Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


On Mothertalkers:

Great Commencement Speeches

Hand Wringing Over Handwriting

Are We Worse Off Than Our Parents?

Another Good BPN Question

Weekend Open Thread

On Street Prophets:

Iced Coffee Anyone?

News from the 'Net

Happy Hour With Pastor Dan

Jay Bakker Speaks Out Against Homophobia

The Problem With Manifestos