People who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.
Political analysis and debate right? Thats why I love this site despite some peoples view of me.
But there are serious issues to be discussed, and when they come up they need to be looked at . We are electing a nominee here, a leader we can place our faith in and trust.
After my last diary tonite I figured I was done, but lo and behold I surf through CNN and what stands up and whispers to me, taunting my overtaxed brain is this.
Dean had own secret energy group
Candidate criticizes Cheney task force for secrecy
Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean has demanded release of secret deliberations of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force.
But as Vermont governor, Dean had an energy task force that met in secret and angered state lawmakers.
Dean's Vermont re-election campaign received only small contributions from energy executives.
But a political action committee created as he prepared to run for president collected $19,000, or nearly a fifth of its first $110,000, from donors tied to Vermont's electric utilities.
I mean how could my synapses not peerk up :)
Actually the article is not totally damning, and seems to have resulted in some real benefits for the state of VT.
In 1998, Dean's Vermont similar task force met in secret to write a plan for revamping state electricity markets that would slow rising consumer costs and relieve utilities of a money-losing deal with a Canadian company.
The task force's work resulted in Vermont having the first utility in the country to meet energy efficiency standards.
It also freed the state's utilities from their deal with a giant Canadian power company, Hydro Quebec, that had left them near bankruptcy but passed as much as 90 percent of those costs to consumers. Utility shareholders also suffered some losses.
But the question for me here remains, how important is the issue of openess and secrecy in things concerning the people and the govt
To me its obvious that Cheneys task force was crooked as hell stacked only with special interest.
Whereas in Deans case Dean said his group developed better policy, was bipartisan and sought advice not just from energy executives but also from environmentalists and advocates of low-income residents.
So perhaps secrecy can be a beneficial thing at times, and that is pretty much the main issue of this diary. I almost tend to believe some things may need to be done in secrecy, otherwise some shit may never get done.
and I am not comparing Deans task force to Cheneys, that would be a stretch even I couldnt make.
Anyways ,just remember I love you guys, your insights and wisdom and humour
(well most of you anyways) :)