Ed Schultz is suggesting, in his program today, that because the Democratic voters who exercised that rights yesterday represents only a small percentage of the total electorate, then it is o.k. for Lieberman to run in the general election since what happened yesterday does not reflect the true will of the people of the CT.

Ed Schultz loves to call himself a progressive when in fact he is an opportunist.

He is no progressive at all!!!

He's a conservative who wants to talk like a progressive!!!

It is about time we let Ed Schultz know that he is no freakin' progressive. He should comes out from his charade and show his true political identity.

He's a moron to the highest order!!!! HYPOCRITE!!!!

I only listen to his program cause KTLK 1150 AM is the only progressive radio station in our area. If only there is other progressive station I could listen to during his time slot I will do.I hope they take him off the air.

Kanye West going off from the script, said this on live national TV in NBC. . .

I hate the way they portray us in the media. You see a black family, it says, "They're looting." You see a white family, it says, "They're looking for food." And, you know, it's been five days [waiting for federal help] because most of the people are black. And even for me to complain about it, I would be a hypocrite because I've tried to turn away from the TV because it's too hard to watch. I've even been shopping before even giving a donation, so now I'm calling my business manager right now to see what is the biggest amount I can give, and just to imagine if I was down there, and those are my people down there. So anybody out there that wants to do anything that we can help -- with the way America is set up to help the poor, the black people, the less well-off, as slow as possible. I mean, the Red Cross is doing everything they can. We already realize a lot of people that could help are at war right now, fighting another way -- and they've given them permission to go down and shoot us!

George Bush doesn't care about black people!

This is from the Tidings - a Southern California Catholic Weekly - by Rev. Richard P. McBrien. I just want to share with you his opinion regarding the republican catholics and the evangelical christians alliance.

The best the way to counter the "fear" campaign of the republicans and white house is to fight them with "fear" also, by campaigning that if bushco were re-defeated they will start drafting for the war in Iraq, as Sen. Edwards said. CBS News featured the draft in their news yesterday and I think it put fear on electorate with age 18-26 yead old. This may not be true but who cares as long as it will be good theme for us in the campaign. But who knows, maybe they are really planning to make the draft after the election, they denying it this time but how many times have they deny one thing then do it anyway.

I realized while trying to rationalize the mood the of the american voters, that inspite of the carnage and quagmire in Iraq, the record busting budget deficit, the terrible economic condition of the nation, the lies and deception of the ruling class, foremost is the president, desecration of the memory of those who die on 9/11, but still somehow the voters still love and are still willing to return to power those responsible for these terrible mess. I can only wonder and asked, WHY???

Then a voice came to me (actualy its from my wife) and said because the people love the WAR!!!

Yes!!! the american people love WAR!!!!

Because they love the military, any and all the branch of it, they consider it an honor to be in the service. Don't get me wrong, but, you can prove your might when you use it. Since we have the mightiest army, navy, air force and marines, we have to show the world how mighty we are!!!

Unfortunately, the republicans know about this thing and they are trying to take all the advantage out of this. The republicans always want to prove that they are the best in building up the might of the armed forces, therefore, they are the only one who can protect these country. If war is what the people want then war is what they will give them just for the sake of satisfying the love for the war of the american people.

Ask your self, who are the most popular president?

They all served one way or the other in the armed forces or THEY ALL HAVE BEEN TO WAR!!!

WASHINTON, LINCOLN, GRANT, TED ROOSEVELT, F.D.R.,
JACK KENNEDY AND SO AND SO FORTH.

The people love war, that is why they again put into power the responsible for this war.

GWB (George Without Blame) keeps blaming everybody except himself.

He blames Pres. Clinton for the his disastrous stewardship of the economy, after three & half years under his administration he still blames Pres. Clinton.

HE IS GWB (George Without Blame). You can blame everybody except him.

GWB = GEORGE WITHOUT BLAME

This is from this morning column of E.J. Dionne:

"Do conservative politicians who care primarily about taxes and the interests of big business merely use "conservative values" as a slogan for attracting votes from the less well-off who gain little or nothing from their economic programs? Are conservatives perfectly happy to condemn liberals for being "permissive" but unwilling (especially after a primary) to say a critical word about their business allies when they use sex to sell products and increase profits? If Bill Armstrong thought Pete Coors's values were so defective before Tuesday, why should he think they are fine now that Coors is the Republican candidate?"

"What do conservatives really care about -- their values or their incomes? The Colorado Senate race gives them an excellent opportunity to show what matters most."

AS I ALWAYS SAY - THEY ARE JUST BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES!!!  HYPOCRITES!!!  HYPOCRITES!!!

Just read from Capitol Hill Blue website this information.

Just to let you know that the "great pretender" is breaking down.

New York Times had a very interesting article regarding historical precedents on the reelections of Pres. Jimmy Carter and Harry Truman but I do not think you can apply that to Bush because he's immune to any precedents. These rules on precedents does not apply to him. Consider these: (1) 2002 mid term election, all contemporary precedents suggest that party in power always lose some seats in congress, and on the other hand the opposition always pick up seats in congress but what happen? The Democrats instead of gaining seats actually lost seats in the House and in the Senate. (2) All president that won the electoral college but lost in the popular vote were always defeated by the same opponent in their re-election but Al Gore beg off in this election that is why this historical precedent will not happen to Bush.

What I am saying is that we must not rely on previous precedents as if they are prophesy, but work hard for the election of John Kerry and John Edwards.

We are up against a person who is possess with an unnatural luck that is why we must unite all our power to defeat his menacing forces.