Somehow we managed to avoid riots after
this was published in
Harper's in March 2005.
This is from an interview with a 21-year-old Afghan man whose DoD discharge letter shows that he was detained Dec 2002-May 2004.
We were not so sad when we were tortured. But when they insulted Islam it was really very difficult. They would come into the cell and search our belongings. They would pick up the Holy Koran and go through it page by page like they were looking for something. We didn't understand what they were saying while they did this. Then they would throw the Holy Koran on the ground or drop it in the latrine. This made us very upset. They searched our cells every day, sometimes many times a day.
E-mail your support to Newsweek
Tue May 17, 2005 at 10:36:24 AM PDT
Okay guys, this is bullshit and we know it. Now go tell that to
Newsweek, because you better damn well believe that the right-wingers are sending hate mail by the barrel.
Sample letter and contact info on the flip.
Evangelical faith-based news is HUGE--CJR article
Fri May 06, 2005 at 10:24:10 AM PDT
6 TV networks. Tens of millions of viewers. 2,000 radio stations. 85 percent growth since 1998.
Evanglical broadcasting. Read this Columbia Journalism Review article.
They were distoring and propagandizing Schiavo for 3 years before she hit the mainstream. Republican senators have appeared on their stations to denounce judges and promote the "nuclear option."
It's likely that Christian broadcasters have helped drive . . . the surge in "value voters" and the drive to sustain Terri Schiavo's life, a story that was incubated in evangelical media three years before it hit the mainstream. . . . They've been courted by the likes of Rupert Murdoch, Mel Gibson, and George W. Bush.
The role that evangelicals are credited with playing in the recent election seems only to have improved broadcasters' access to power. During the opening session of the 2005 NRB convention, Wright described a recent lobbying excursion to Capitol Hill. "We got into rooms we've never been in before," he said. "We got down on the floor of the Senate and prayed over Hillary Clinton's desk."
more pull quotes on the flip
Investigation to Exonerate Tom DeLay Update
Wed May 04, 2005 at 10:04:09 AM PDT
Now that Congress has flip-flopped on ethics rules so that Tom DeLay can be investigated "in order to exonerate him" (in Speaker Hastert's words), let's see how things are going. It looks like The New York Times has some
information.
Newly disclosed documents show that the . . . the lobbyist, Jack Abramoff, submitted bills to his law firm for more than $350,000 in expenses for several trips to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands [for Congressmen] as well as several others including Edwin Buckham, Mr. DeLay's former chief of staff, and Tony Rudy, his former deputy chief of staff. . . .
Mr. Abramoff . . . also had a role in arranging and paying for a trip to Britain for Mr. DeLay, his wife and members of his staff in May 2000. The trip included stops in London and at the St. Andrews golf course in Scotland. . . .
Ethics lawyers, and his former law firm, say that was a clear violation of House rules.
Vanity Fair story on Gannon--Daschle knew, reporters wouldn't listen
Mon May 02, 2005 at 10:20:33 AM PDT
The Gannon story isn't dead. Salon.com
reports that Vanity Fair is planning a story on Gannon in its next issue. From Salon.com.
The next issue of Vanity Fair will include the magazine's piece on the reporter sometimes known as Jim Guckert. And as Howard Kurtz reports in the Washington Post, it will reveal that Gannon's seedy past wasn't exactly a secret to some in Washington: Tom Daschle's campaign staff apparently learned about Gannon's gay sex Web sites while Gannon was pounding on Daschle during his unsuccessful re-election race in 2004. Vanity Fair says that Daschle's campaign spread the word about Gannon, but that no reporters picked up on the story then.
There is no more oil
Mon Apr 25, 2005 at 02:44:47 PM PDT
Today President Bush met with Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. Obviously, they
talked about oil and about upping production to offset U.S. price hikes. Here's the problem:
But it is not clear that the Saudis have as much clout over the oil market as they used to. For one thing, the rise in prices has been driven as much as anything by surging demand from the fast-growing economies of China and India, a trend that is likely only to increase. For another, the Saudis are already pumping oil at rates closer to their maximum sustainable capacity than during previous price spikes . . .
In 2002 Saudi Aramco, the state owned oil company, says it produced 6.8 million barrels of oil per day. The Saudis are now estimated to produce about 9.5 million barrels a day. . . . the spare capacity available to the Saudis to smooth out price spikes [is down from 3 million barrels per day] to about 1.2 million barrels a day.
What was Bush's reponse? Conserve? Less SUVs? Tougher mileage standards?