I've debated posting this in an open thread vs. wasting people's time with a diary like this, but I figure this is one way I might get the attention of the person who gave me this zero and other seemingly frivolous/malicious ratings.

And I'd really like to discuss this and my (apparently) offending behavior with him/her.

I was almost on board with the electability thing as far as Kerry was concerned.

I'm a Dean supporter and will vote for him in the primary in March if he's still in the race or not, but I was getting a little easier about holding my nose and voting for Kerry if he's the nominee while ignoring:

      Kerry's coziness with special interest money
         Connection with Torricelli and Gibbs in the Osama Iowa ad

       Vote enabling Bush to invade Iraq

       Vote enacting the Patriot Act

and other things I've heard that I find troubling...

I'll probably still vote Dean in the primary and Kerry (if he's the nominee) in November. But reading this article someone posted a link

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A42676-2004Feb14?language=printer

 to in Trapper John's thread on the main page has reminded me...these are the Democrats we're talking about.

In today's NY Times, there's a story

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/31/politics/campaign/31DONA.html?hp

 about the Dem candidates and their rhetoric against special interests in Washington and a brief examination of their relationships--and their campaigns' relationships--with varous interest groups like lobbyists.

I'm a Dean supporter and I'm pleased to see Kerry and Edwards spotlighted in this article. All you K and E supporters can critique why this story is unfair to your guys I'm sure. I'm not using this to slam either guy or their campaign. I haven't researched them enough to know whether this is fair to them or not.

But what really ticks me off and demonstrates AGAIN how the media is  not covering the meat of this campaign is this:

I''ve been seeing articles  like this one about super delegates and they make it look like Howard Dean is ahead in the delegate count.

What's this all about?

 
     Breakdown of Presidential Delegates

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-ap-delegate-count,1,6386147.story?coll= sns-ap-politics-headlines
 

           By The Associated Press
The current breakdown of the presidential preferences of delegates to the Democratic national convention. The numbers are based on party and state rules, delegate interviews and analysis of election results by The Associated Press. The first column shows the delegate total for each candidate; the others show delegates gained or lost during the last day, week and month.

DEMOCRATIC

Dean               104  0     +7  +7

Clark                 29   0       0    0

Kerry                 75   0 +20 +20

Lieberman       25  0        0     0

Gephardt          59   0       0     0

Edwards           34   0   +18 +18

Kucinich               2  0        0     0

Sharpton              4   0        0     0

Other                     1   0        0     0

Uncommitted        0   0        0     0

Needed to nominate 2162
Total Delegate Votes 4322

Chosen thus far 333
Yet to be chosen 3,989

I don't know if anyone has posted this yet, but I just saw this AP article about Dean's record with minority appointments when he was governor. The infamous  Nedra contributed,,,,

 
    

Dean tried to appoint minorities in Vermont

By Ross Sneyd

Jan. 12, 2004  |  MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) -- During more than a decade as Vermont governor, Howard Dean did not appoint any blacks or Hispanics to his Cabinet, but minority leaders say it was not for lack of trying in the nearly all-white state.

None of Dean's five cabinet secretaries or top commissioners was Hispanic or black during the more than 11 years he served in office, as he was forced to concede during a Democratic presidential debate Sunday.

Dean pointed out during the debate that he had hired as a senior staff member a black woman. He did not mention that Bonnie Aten-Johnson worked part time while keeping a job with the Burlington, Vt., schools.

Contending that recruiting minorities for high-level posts in state government is difficult in a state that is nearly 98 percent white, one black leader who met regularly with Dean praised his efforts as governor. He recalled turning down Dean's requests to serve in the administration.
"He asked if I had an interest or if I knew of anyone who had an interest," said Vaughn Carney, a lawyer and executive with a financial services company. "I myself was constrained by other commitments. I wasn't aware of anyone who would be qualified or would be available."
Carney accepted posts on three low-profile commissions. "Those who have assumed the mantle of leadership in Vermont's very small black community are fully aware of Dr. Dean's commitment to inclusion, to diversity, and to fairness," he said.
Other Democratic presidential candidates serving in Congress say their staffs are far more diverse. A spokesman for Sen. Joe Lieberman said of 64 staffers on his personal, committee and state staffs, 17 percent were minorities. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina employs 10 blacks on his Senate staff of 39. Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio said three of 17 staff members are minorities.  Messages left for the campaigns of Massachusetts Sens. John Kerry and Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt were not immediately returned.
Minorities comprise 2.1 percent of Vermont's population of 608,827, according to Census Department figures for 2000. Less than 1 percent of the population -- 5,504 -- are Hispanic. Even fewer -- 3,063 -- are black.

The 150-member Vermont House has two minority members while the 30-member Senate has one.

Dean's appointments to the state bench were constrained by law to nominees from a list vetted by the state Judicial Nominating Board. No blacks were appointed to judgeships during the Dean administration. He appointed at least one Hispanic, Jane Gomez Dimotsis, who became a judge in 1999.

"It wasn't that Howard didn't try," said Kathy Hoyt, Dean's former chief of staff. "He asked everybody to recruit for us in the minority community."

Hoyt said one effort to recruit a black man to the Cabinet fell through because he would not be paid as much as he was making in Massachusetts. She could not recall the man's name or the position he was offered.

Campaigning in Iowa, Dean explained that with a handful of Cabinet slots and little turnover, he didn't have many positions to fill, and he had trouble competing with better job recruiters such as IBM and the University of Vermont.

"I'm not the least bit ashamed of defensive about my civil rights record," he told reporters. "I was taken aback by the reverend's (Al Sharpton's) attack and I should have perhaps been a little quicker on my feet. But we made every effort we could and by and large were successful."

He promised that if elected president, "my Cabinet will look like the rest of America."

But to some in the minority community, Dean could have done more. John Tucker, an activist and volunteer with Burlington's Peace and Justice Center, said Dean should have sought more minority points of view.

"I think if you really want to do it, you take a cross section," said Tucker, who is black. "You get all the different opinions. You don't take one opinion and go with it."

H. Lawrence McCrorey, a retired University of Vermont biophysics professor who advised Dean on a regular basis, said being willing to listen to minority viewpoints was at least as important as hiring blacks.

"The fact that people, white people, have made black appointments is in and of itself no reason to vote for them," said McCrorey, who is black.

"I know Howard Dean and I believe he is on very firm ground in the sense of civil rights," McCrorey said. "He understands justice. He understands civil rights."

------

Associated Press Writer Nedra Pickler in Iowa contributed to this report.