1st Main reason to NOT vote for Obama is Cult of personality.
Any  Cult like that end up with Disaster - Germany & USSR are best
examples. Misbehavior of his supporters absolutely unacceptable as well.

2nd reason is Obama's refusal to acknowledge the idiocy and
mistakes in his "medical plan" and lack of mandatory requirements.
Instead of me arguing about that just read Paul Krugman.

3rd reason is his wrong talk about Reagan and his "ideas". Reagan
is as failure almost as much as Bush and Reagan is literally the public enemy.

First of all, stop this propaganda that Obama won something important. He won:

1. caucuses, which are notoriously anti-democratic, just read this:

from http://electoral-vote.com/...
"Obama did especially well in Idaho, Kansas, and Alaska. Whut? Yes, Idaho, Kansas, and Alaska. One of the big questions of this election has been the role of identity politics. Would white people vote for a black man, for example. Well, Idaho, Kansas, and Alaska are full of white people. In fact, they have very few minorities of any kind (except the Eskimos in Alaska). What gives?

The secret is in the asterisk. Notice the little asterisks in Obama's top five states. An asterisk today denotes a caucus state. Obama did extremely well in caucus states and Clinton did very badly in them. How come? Turnout in caucus states is always low, usually about 10-20% of the electorate. Only highly motivated people bother to show up, especially the Democratic caucuses, which go on for hours and people have to publicly defend their choice.

It is crystal clear of what Obama is doing.
Obama is hijacking the nomination.

He has found the hole in a way how Democrats nominate.
And hole is very simple and very known - caucuses.

Everybody knows: caucuses cannot accommodate all voters.
Caucuses accommodate a few percent of potential voters.

Obama decided to create enough activists and train them.
Then Obama sends obamaniaks to caucuses with simple task.

Task is to overwhelm any other potential participants.
Overwhelm them with noise, intimidation, duration.

Overwhelm them with absence of ballots and privacy.
As a result tens millions of votes do not count.

Instead, the caucuses produced faked voting results (like 79% for Obama in Idaho),  fabricated by campaign activists and Mass Media and 2 main political parties.

As a result of caucuses Obama got hundreds of delegates which are way more illegitimate than delegates from Florida and Michigan or Superdelegates.

(More below)

"silver spring" published on MYDD.com, Tue Feb 05, 2008 at 11:42:35 AM EST
the following story:
http://www.mydd.com/...
his story deserved to be reposted on obamakos, so you will know how you
got your polling numbers
==========================
"I found this interesting story in the Legal Times this morning:

http://www.law.com/... sp?id=1201601143051&hub=TopStoriesMo re

"The Battle for Superdelegates Heats Up in D.C."

"James Zogby is firmly in the Obama camp -- so much so that he's worked other superdelegates on behalf of the Obama campaign. The president of the Arab American Institute says he first heard Obama speak at the 2004 convention, when Obama burst onto the national political stage, and he was impressed.

Clinton Appears to Blunt Late Obama Charge in California: 24 hours till votes are counted in the California Democratic Primary, Hillary Clinton appears to fend-off a late charge from Barack Obama,
52% Clinton, 42% Obama,
according to SurveyUSA's 13th and final pre-primary tracking poll. Obama leads among men. Clinton leads among women. 44-point Gender Gap. Clinton leads among whites. Obama leads among blacks. 53-point Race Gap. Among younger voters, Clinton leads by 3. Among older voters, Clinton leads by 18. In greater San Francisco, the contest is tied. In the Central Valley, Clinton leads by 7. In greater Los Angeles, Clinton leads by 15. In the Inland Empire, Clinton leads by 16.
Link:
http://www.surveyusa.com/...

SurveyUSA just published multiple fresh polls, like
this for California (2000 respondents, so it is more accurate than other polls):
http://www.surveyusa.com/...

Major result are the following double digit lead in 6 major states:

NY Democratic Primary SurveyUSA Clinton 56, Obama 38 Clinton +18
NJ Democratic Primary SurveyUSA Clinton 52, Obama 41 Clinton +11
MA Democratic Primary SurveyUSA Clinton 56, Obama 39 Clinton +17
MO Democratic Primary SurveyUSA Clinton 54, Obama 43 Clinton +11
OK Democratic Primary SurveyUSA Clinton 54, Obama 27 Clinton +27
CA Democratic Primary SurveyUSA Clinton 53, Obama 41 Clinton +12

Also as as a bonus, Columbus Dispatch published fresh poll in Ohio:

Ohio Democratic Primary Columbus Dispatch Clinton 42, Obama 19, Clinton +23

As a result I am adjusting my forecast for tomorrow:

This is Published: Feb 03, 2008 12:30 AM, see:
http://www.newsobserver.com/...
and Modified: Feb 03, 2008 06:58 AM

ARIZONA

Clinton, 43 percent
Obama, 41 percent
undecided, 13 percent

CALIFORNIA

Clinton, 45 percent
Obama, 36 percent
undecided, 16 percent

GEORGIA

Obama, 47 percent
Clinton, 41 percent
undecided, 10 percent

MISSOURI

Clinton, 47 percent
Obama, 41 percent
undecided, 10 percent

NEW JERSEY

Clinton, 46 percent
Obama, 39 percent
undecided, 12 percent

Florida and Michigan have 8.5 % of population of USA and similar amount
of delegates for Democratic convention. Republicans having the field day in
Florida today and having much more attention that Democrats, because
DNC wants to punish Florida and Michigan voters. It will for sure upset
them and certain portion of them will vote for republican candidate
in general election because of this frustration.
In addition none of the nominees will be legitimate without Florida and
Michigan delegates. DNC made horrible mistake and Dr. Dean has less than
24 hours to correct it. See poll below!

530,322 voted yesterday in South Carolina,
more than 286000 of them - blacks. 81% of black
voters (about 232000) voted for Obama and only 1-2% of blacks voted
for Edwards. However 40% whites voted for Edwards. It is obvious,
that black voters voted by race not by merits.
Obama got only 63000 of non-black voters - much less than Hillary or
Edwards. What is most interesting that number of black voters (CNN
said new 155000 black voters in 2008 compare with 2004) more than
doubled compare with 2004 and they almost all voted for Obama.

You can add to that the obvious problems with pollsters - they used
a wrong assumption about number of black voters and collected wrong
information about how black voters will vote (one may guess that many
people intentionally gave untrue answer to pollsters).

What all this means (with poll):

Democrats as a primary voters and as a party never stopped to amaze me.
It is obvious that Republicans helping Democrats to nominate Obama for
very simple reason: they know they have a chance to win against Obama.
They will swift boat him for sure. And they know that in many states
Obama will not have a chance. Even their villages idiots like O'Reilly
embracing Obama, see here:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/...
"Obama: There's a whole bunch of people over there I've got to talk to.
O'Reilly: Thank you very much, You're a good guy. We like you."

So if you looking to replace one republican President with another
Republican president - go ahead and vote in Primaries for Obama.
And if you will do so, prepare for more GOP-fabricated disasters.
Democrats: you doing it with your own vote.

Pelosi & Reid said after lunch with Bush that they will
work with him. None of them even mentioned their
rethoric that they used just a few days before the election.
Pelosi even promised that no impeachment happened! And Reid
said only a few investigations, just to make sure that
oversight responsibily met.

Neither Reid no Pelosi behaved as WE got much better MANDATE
(55% to 42% for GOPs) then Bush ever got, see
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

Lamont lost because he stopped being himself and started
behave senatorial instead of talking about Iraq. Bush kisser
Mr. Lieberman re-declared himself as Democrat after he was
rejected by majority of Democrats. And desperate for senate
majority of DEMs silently accepted this dirty trick!

We all know that election in 2000 and in 2004 were stolen.
It looks like people forgot about it, while doing their
predictions 11/07/06. If you will check popular sites,
you will get projection between 221 and 230 Democratic seats
for new house and about 50-50 prediction for the Senate.

So, since we know that GOPs already successful and
experienced in stealing votes, what can stop
them from changing outcome just in dozen
of congressional districts and in 2 of senatorial races?
We all know where is fate of senate will be decided:

Missouri, Tennessee, Virginia. And don't forget
Montana & Ohio.

Republicans know that stealing votes, lies and fears are
only 3 options left for them. And rest of us already knew
that nothing will stop them from using these 3 options.
So my questions is: what Democrats prepare to do in order
to prevent STOLEN ELECTION again? I personally do not
see too much of preparation in this area.

See links and poll below the fold:

Democratic National Committee Chair Howard Dean got
primetime today 7pm on CNN.

He will discuss the port controversy, the war on terror
and Bush's slump in the polls, see
http://www.cnn.com/...

It is his 2nd apperance on CNN in 2 weeks. On
February 16, 2006 he appeared on CNN's "American Morning"
to discuss the Democratic agenda and National Security.
Dean discussed allegations that Vice President Dick Cheney
may have authorized former Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter"
Libby to leak classified information in a time of war for
political gain. Dean stressed the importance that if Cheney
is found responsible for leaking classified information
during a time of war, the Vice President should step down.

Just heard om AirAmericaRadio.com (12/23/04, 10:30am):

go to http://www.choosetheblue.com
and choose blue before buy:

   "* ChooseTheBlue.com compiles information from third party sources primarily to show certain reported spending by political action committees connected with a corporation* and by that corporation's employees as political contributions, in each case related to recent federal elections. .

    * If each American who voted "Blue" in 2004 spends $200 in 2005 on products of a corporation that by reason of its employees' or connected political action committees' political contributions supported "Blue" over "Red," $10 billion in revenues would be shifted to "Blue" supporting corporations!

    * This will be noticed!  Choose where you buy ... and make a difference!!! "

I personally promise to spend more then $20000
and from now on I will prefer BLUE over RED vendors!
 And I will check twice BLUEISHNESS of the producer/vendor!

see
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/K/KERRY_RECOUNT?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US
or
http://ap.tbo.com./ap/breaking/MGBJY6U2O2E.html

Dec 12, 10:20 PM EST

Kerry Lawyer Seeks Ohio Ballot Inspection

By MARK WILLIAMS
Associated Press Writer
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- Democrat John Kerry is asking county elections officials to allow his witnesses to inspect the 92,000 ballots
cast in Ohio in which no vote for president was recorded, a Kerry lawyer said Sunday night.
The request is one of 11 the Kerry campaign made in a letter sent over the weekend to Ohio's 88 county boards of election, which
will begin recounting presidential ballots this week.

GOPs wanted to cut Federal taxes? Let them do
so and even vote for more of it! It will lead to
less money in government hands, right? WRONG!

Since BLUE STATES now have the taxation without
reperesentation, I suggest for BLUE STATES to form
a mutual TAX UNION and compensate the Bush's
FEDERAL TAX CUT for rich with equivalent STATE TAX
INCREASE FOR RICH in BLUE STATES. Since blue states
paying most taxes and red states receiving them
it will help BLUE STATES to redistribute tax money
back to themselves and create BLUE STATE
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS to compensate the destruction of
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAMs by GOPs