Given that the idea that race will be a bigger factor in Pennsylvania than will sexism, I thought I'd share my perspective as a native of the Pittsburgh area. The issues of racism in that state are different than those in the South, I think, and I have seen many people confused by it. This is my take on things, so grain of salt and all of that.
I have long liked Obama, although was never fully in his camp, but I have to say that his speech yesterday was deeply moving to me.
There was something so refreshing about hearing someone admit that they love someone, count them as family, embrace their good points and still recognize that the person can have deeply flawed views of the world. And it made me cry as I thought of my very special great-aunt.
Randi Rhodes has never been my favorite among liberal talk show hosts, I'll admit, but her show used to be OK. But I listened for a half hour today, and she was just terrible and way off the rails.
There were a bunch of things that annoyed me about her little diatribe today. Being an Edwards supporter, the last annoyed me the most, but I'll go as I recall things in chronological order.
I am still for Edwards. I prefer his rhetoric and attitude about what's to come in the general and in changing the country. Please don't use this diary to try to persuade me onto the Obama bandwagon. I'm strapped in and happy where I am, at least unless my candidate leaves the race. If y'all can dream and hope, so can I.
Nonetheless, I like to share news that will make people happy, and as mad as I get at some of the Obama supporters (and other candidate supporters, for that matter), some of you are quite nice and will enjoy this. :)
So, a "real-life voter" story my mom shared with me follows.
I don't often write diaries. I certainly never thought I'd find myself writing one that would get me into the candidate wars. But this Edwards is playing Nader nonsense seems to be spreading, and I feel a need to respond.
The great irony of equating Edwards to Nader because he is staying in the primary is that it buys into the greatest fallacy of Nader's own third-party run: That if we elect a Democratic candidate it will be just as bad as electing the Republican.
OK, I realize that 9/11 was supposed to kill irony, I didn't realize it had to kill all understanding of sarcasm and humor.
I watched the Kucinich answer. He was joking. Yes, I saw something I couldn't identify, aka a UFO, and now I'm opening campaign offices in two of the best known sites of UFO lore. It was a sarcastic answer to one of the stupider questions in debate history, a high bar indeed, but that one shattered it.
According to the Columbus Dispatch, my U.S. representative and one of the worst of the Bushbots may not seek re-election in 2008.
Mary Jo Kilroy nearly won this seat in 2006 (it was in recounts for weeks), and she would be the favorite against anyone the GOP might put up. One possible candidate, Steve Stivers, however is an Iraq veteran. With luck, the GOP will turn instead to former Attorney General and Auditor Jim Petro.
Here's a neat little story that I think is wonderful fun for conspiracy-happy hearts like my own.
Short version: The man in charge of PR for the military base in Roswell, N.M., in 1947 died a couple of years ago. He left an affidavit to be opened only after his death, and its contents were publicly released last week. It contains his sworn statements that he saw an alien spacecraft, alien bodies and was involved in the decision to make up the weather balloon story.
I wasn't sure whether this was heartening or terribly sad to me, but I think this anecdote from a Wiggles concert here in Columbus last evening shows something has changed in this country in the past several years.
Wow, almost a year. That's difficult to believe. And I know people are still suffering and trying to rebuild their lives and their city.
I'm going to share the essay I wrote for the book I promote in my tagline. Lots of people were involved, and it's still for sale, BTW. This essay can't touch luckydog's, though, damn; I'm still crying.
I am sad because while I loved the opportunity to hear the Rev. Jim Wallis speak in Columbus, his fellow speaker, Rev. Russell Johnson, fulfilled every negative stereotype of the religious right. Ssomehow, I hoped against wisdom that I would find something positive in what the man said. I hoped, honestly, that I would hear something that gave us real common ground, and I only heard platitudes and lip service to what I consider grounding Christian -- heck call it human -- principles.
After Katrina, my husband got in touch with some of his contacts in the gaming industry with an idea to put together a book in tribute to the New Orleans region and raise some money for hurricane relief. So, many volunteers and 150 or so pages later, the book is availabe as a pdf or in a print-on-demand version.
I hope no one minds that I'm going to use this space to ask for some help with a project very dear to my heart.
I'm a participant in a project we're calling "Beyond The Storm: Shadows of the Big Easy." You can find out more at this Website: www.beyondthestorm.us. We really could use your help.
So, my husband and I had free babysitting last night (Thanks, Mom!), so we headed out for a night on the town. Dinner was great, and the company was, of course, wonderful.
And then things went to shit because we decided to see Carlos Mencia. I honestly felt sick by the time we finally got our check and got out the door, which was before the end of the act. My regret is that we didn't just get the check, two-drink minimum be damned. I'll explain how much the show sucked in the extended.
After a couple of days of mourning and negativity, I sat down this morning and tried to find the reasons to keep trying. I've posted this on my livejournal, but I thought I'd also like to share it here. I'm sure all of it has been said somewhere or another, but here's my take on it.
So, it's bleak, but it wasn't an utter disaster.
The Democrats nearly defeated an incumbent war-time president who enjoyed 90 percent popularity at one point in his presidency. Almost every state mirrored the 2000 result. Things are still pretty much evenly divided, even in most of the red states there are a lot of blue votes. Bush received more presidential votes than anyone in history, it's true, but the person who received the second-highest number is John Kerry. Yes, Bush won many, many more counties, but I don't think we're likely to see "Votes for cows and prairie dogs" movements any time soon. The urban/rural split is as old as the country, and it gives a distinct land-mass advantage to the party aligned with rural voters. That's reality.
I have an online acquaintance who has spent much of the past year defending Bush endlessly and rambling on about how Bush is sure to win, blah, blah. It certainly seemed a major focus for him to show why Bush was the candidate and simply had to win or it would mean victory for "Islamofacism." (What the hell does that mean anyway? Is there Christofacism that is inherently superior or something?)