Daily Kos

Email: cynthia-spam-begone-@dubose-design.com

NY Times: Hillary will twist superdelegate arms

Wed Mar 05, 2008 at 02:35:43 PM PDT

This is a going to be a short diary -- I'm at work.  I didn't see anyone else diarying this,  so ...

Article in NY Times: Clinton Campaign Plans an Endgame.

Money quote:

Mrs. Clinton and her advisers now believe that with her victories in Texas and Ohio last night, she can convince superdelegates to stand with her after a Pennsylvania victory.

My Email Exchange with Party Insider on Superdelegates

Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 10:19:38 AM PDT

I just had an email exchange with a regional director of the Democratic Party that has me a little disturbed -- but I'm not sure whether or not I should be!

I won't say his name or where I live because I don't want to identify him.  Suffice it to say I'm in California. I don't know this man too well, but I've seen him at several MoveOn-sponsored events, and I am on his mailing list.

His email was in response to the MoveOn petition to urge the "superdelegates" to not overturn the wishes of the voters.  He didn't like it, and his critique took the form of a response to each part of the MoveOn email. I'll put the MoveOn statements in normal type and his response in italics -- and my own comments (if any) in bold.

Dear MoveOn member, You've probably heard about the "superdelegates" who could end up deciding the Democratic nominee.

There is no such thing as a "superdelegate".  That is just a nickname.  They are actually called unpledged delegates, and there are several varieties.  They do not "decide" anything.  They each get one vote, just the same as everyone else.

( More beyond the break ...)

McCain Could Win

Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 04:20:58 PM PDT

... And I don't mean the nomination, I mean the election.

I mean this diary as a "wake-up call", lest we get too confident. We need to be as prepared as possible.

Of course we don't yet know if McCain will win the Republican nomination. But let's assume for the moment that he does. And let's face it straight on: this guy has a great personality. He can be charming and disarming, and he's got the media on his side. And whether or not it's justified, he is in fact seen as the "straight talker" of politics. He has branded himself that way, and there's certainly some truth to it. He does speak more bluntly about certain things (such as, for example, manufacturing jobs in Michigan not coming back). As politicians go, he is fairly straightforward. That goes a long way with a lot of people, especially in the current climate of disgust with "politicians".

National Review: GOP in Deep Doo-Doo

Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 02:02:50 PM PDT

[Promoted by DHinMI:  I've recently explored the possibility that the 2008 election could be somewhat like the 1932 election when FDR was elected with a huge majority, which was the start of a Democratic electoral coalition that lasted for decades; I'll revisit the subject on Sunday.  Apparently the boys over at the National Review are also thinking we could be on the verge of a big Democratic win next year.]

I actually shelled out hard-earned cash to buy a copy of the National Review today ... seduced by the cover story, The Coming Cataclysm:  Why the GOP Faces One and How to Avoid It, written by Ramesh Ponnuru and Richard Lowry.  How could I resist?  I had to see if their analysis was right, and more to the point, if they thought there really WAS a way to avoid it.  I approached with a bit of trepidation, I must admit.  I was worried that they might actually HAVE a silver bullet, or some trick up their sleeve, or even some grand new vision that would save things for them.

So what's their solution to avoiding the cataclysm?

The short answer is, with a wing and a prayer.  The long answer is ... well, follow me into Conservative Land, if you can bear it. (This trip will not be as bad as you might think ...)

Brownstein likens Bush to Polk -- ultimately forgotten!!

Mon Jan 02, 2006 at 08:40:06 PM PDT

I didn't see this diaried anywhere today, so forgive me if it's a repeat.

Ronald Brownstein has an interesting column in the LA Times today in which he makes the case that the former president Bush most resembles is James K. Polk, the guy who came before Lincoln.

To quote:

Polk may be the only predecessor who matched Bush's determination to drive massive change on a minute margin of victory. Polk won by fewer than 38,000 votes of 2.7 million cast. Over four tumultuous years, he pursued an ambitious, highly partisan agenda that offered little to those who had voted against him. Sound familiar?

Frank Rich: Pat Tillman Through the Looking Glass

Sun Nov 06, 2005 at 12:49:02 AM PDT

Frank Rich has an interesting column detailing the "Pat Tillman Fantasy".  I must admit I did not follow this story too closely when it was in the news .. either the fake story or the real one.  Reading Rich's excellent synopsis, therefore, has got my blood boiling.  God!! This is much worse than the few snippets that previously caught my attention had led me to believe.

Frank Rich's Column

Is is time for another Court Challenge on Segregated Schools? (w/poll)

Sat Oct 15, 2005 at 10:27:05 AM PDT

OK, I've been reading Jonothan Kozol's "The Shame of the Nation" -- what an eye-opener.

Most Americans think that Brown v. Board of Education and the civil rights struggles of the fifties and sixties resolved the issue of segregated schools for good -- not so, Kozol shows.  Schools are RIGHT NOW as racially segregated as they were in the sixties.

Not only that, the popular new "method" for teaching poor children -- a regimented, draconian, drill-based  approach known as "Success for All" -- segregates these schools in a different, even more insidious way.

Excerpts beyond the jump ...

Poll

What (if anything) should be done about segregated schools?

41%7 votes
17%3 votes
23%4 votes
5%1 votes
0%0 votes
11%2 votes
0%0 votes

| 17 votes | Vote | Results

Anne Frank quote .. can anyone help?

Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 02:39:04 PM PDT

When I was a child I had a copy of "The Diary of Anne Frank" and it was one of my favorite books.

Now, I can't swear to this (maybe I dreamed it?) but I THINK there was something in the forward, or preface, or something, of that book, by someone, that went something like this:

While Adolf Hitler was commanding the world stage, speaking to hundreds of thousands to thunderous applause, moving huge armies all over Europe, Anne Frank was, unseen and unknown, quietly penning her diary in her small annex.

Now, no one listens to the rantings of Adolf Hitler, but Anne's inspirational words have been read by millions all over the world, and her voice continues to be heard.

(COMPLETELY paraphrased! The original was much more eloquent .. but this was the basic idea.)

More after the jump...

Repub policies causing huge risk shifts

Sun Oct 10, 2004 at 09:42:47 AM PDT

There's a great article in the L.A. Times today about how families have been shouldering more and more of the burden of their own economic security since the 1970s. It's one of the best I've seen at explaining exactly what has been happening to our society since the late 70s (crystallized by Reagan of course).

(unfortunately, registration required at LAT)

The gist:

Starting in the late 1970s, the nation's leaders sought to break a corrosive cycle of rising inflation and stagnating output by remaking the U.S. economy in the image of its frontier predecessor -- deregulating industries, shrinking social programs and promoting a free-market ideal in which everyone must forge his or her own path, free to rise or fall on merit or luck. On the whole, their effort to transform the economy has succeeded.

But the economy's makeover has come at a large and largely unnoticed price: a measurable increase in the risks that Americans must bear as they provide for their families, pay for their houses, save for their retirements and grab for the good life.

Great Graphic

Vanity Fair piece on Florida -- the felon list

Sun Sep 26, 2004 at 03:04:06 PM PDT

Thanks to SCOTUSBlog for posting links to two PDF files containing the recent Vanity Fair article entitled "The Path to Florida".

This is a GREAT article summarizing the 2000 debacle and raising serious concerns about the upcoming election.  Not much new in the 2000-rehash part (there is some input from Supreme Court clerks that's interesting), but this article has the best summary of the felon-list controversy I've yet seen. It's more amazing and messed up than even I (who knew it was amazing and messed up) realized.

Continue on for a summary and some excerpts (warning, LONG) ....

Pressure on Pakistan to get Osama by election -- TNR

Sat Jul 10, 2004 at 12:45:30 AM PDT

I am sorry if this has been mentioned already, but my jaw dropped when I saw this article in The New Republic (not my favorite mag, but I do subscribe!) --

"July Surprise"
by John B. Judis, Spencer Ackerman & Massoud Ansari

Excerpts:

This spring, the administration significantly increased its pressure on Pakistan to kill or capture Osama bin Laden, his deputy, Ayman Al Zawahiri, or the Taliban's Mullah Mohammed Omar, all of whom are believed to be hiding in the lawless tribal areas of Pakistan. A succession of high-level American officials--from outgoing CIA Director George Tenet to Secretary of State Colin Powell to Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca to State Department counterterrorism chief Cofer Black to a top CIA South Asia official--have visited Pakistan in recent months to urge General Pervez Musharraf's government to do more in the war on terrorism.

Well, that doesn't sound TOO bad, but read on ...

More details on abuse at Abu Ghraib

Fri May 14, 2004 at 12:16:15 AM PDT

A horrible story in the NY Times. It looks like Sgts Graner and Frederick are the sadists-in-chief of this despicable bunch.

Some excerpts -- this is mostly the testimony of Jeremy C. Sivits, who is planning to plead guilty and provide information on the others:

The soldiers pulled seven Iraqi detainees from their cells, "tossed them in the middle of the floor" and then one soldier ran across the room and lunged into the pile of detainees, according to sworn statements given to investigators by one of the soldiers now charged with abuse. He did it again, jumping into the group like it was a pile of autumn leaves, and another soldier called for others to join in. The detainees were ordered to strip and masturbate, their heads covered with plastic sandbags. One soldier stomped on their fingers and toes.

.. and:

[Sivits] described another night when a dog was set upon a detainee, and another when a detainee was handcuffed to a bed.

"Graner was in the room with him," he said. "This detainee had wounds on his legs from where he had been shot with the buckshot." Specialist Graner, he said, would "strike the detainee with a half baseball swing, and hit the wounds of the detainee. There is no doubt that this hurt the detainee because he would scream he got hit. The detainee would beg Graner to stop by saying `Mister, Mister, please stop,' or words to that effect."

"I think at one time Graner said in a baby type voice, `Ah, does that hurt?' " Specialist Sivits added.

It does appear they were more or less acting on their own:

The soldiers knew that what they had done was wrong, Specialist Sivits told investigators, at least enough to instruct him not to tell anyone what he had seen. Specialist Sivits was asked if the abuse would have happened if someone in the chain of command was present. "Hell no," he replied, adding: "Because our command would have slammed us. They believe in doing the right thing. If they saw what was going on, there would be hell to pay."

and

The platoon sergeant standing on a tier above the room heard the screams and yelled down at Sergeant Davis to stop, surprising the other soldiers with the anger in his command, Specialist Sivits said. But within two minutes, the platoon sergeant left, and the soldiers resumed the abuse.

There's another NY Times story about Graner's past, before he joined the reserves:

By late 2001, Charles A. Graner Jr.'s life was on a steady downward spiral. His ex-wife and two children had left after a bitter divorce. He had pleaded guilty to stalking and beating his ex-wife. He had been fired from his job as a state prison guard and was having trouble paying the smallest of bills.

Sheesh!!  What were they thinking in hiring this guy to work at a prison?

I've had a hard time thinking straight since I read this.  Angry, disgusted .... even more than before.  This is going to get worse and worse.


::