For example:
Former Israeli Envoy Says the UN Is 'Unnecessary, and Should Be Wiped Off the Face of Earth' -Haaretz
Israel's outgoing Ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, called his former place of employment "an unnecessary building," and said that it should be "wiped off the face of earth." He later went on to declare the land of Israel, including the West Bank, as "belonging to the Jewish People."
"There is no place more corrupt and morally twisted than the UN," Erdan said in the video. "And we must all unite to spread this message worldwide, demanding the closure and dismantling of this organization and the establishment of a new body that truly represents noble values."
In a second video, this one a preview for Erdan's upcoming interview on i24News, he doubled down on his message, calling for the UN to be "wiped off the face of the earth," as he and the interviewer drove past the building.
I must admit, when I left by “mutual” agreement a Multinational Corporation with an NDA and payoff in hand, after dedicating 8 years of my life, I did not wish the directors well but I stopped at that. I think it went something like this “I hope their heads stick where they inserted them” I might have even cursed a little.
It wasn’t even that Gilad Erdan was let go, he had completed his term and was never silenced during his mission.
Now what has got them being diplomatic again?
'A Historic Moment for Us': Palestinians Take Unprecedented Seat at UN General Assembly -Haaretz
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian envoy to the UN, took his place at a table between Sri Lanka and Sudan labeled "State of Palestine." Mansour's seat stemmed from the "rights and privileges" extended to Palestine through the passage of an Arab and Palestinian-sponsored resolution in May, with 143 votes in favor, 19 against and 25 abstentions. The U.S. voted against it, alongside Israel, Argentina, Czechia, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau and Papua New Guinea.
Upon the resolution's adoption, Foreign Minister Israel Katz called the decision a "prize for Hamas," In a statement after the vote, Katz said: "The absurd decision taken today at the UN General Assembly highlights the structural bias of the UN and the reasons why, under the leadership of UN Secretary-General [Antonio] Guterres, it has turned itself into an irrelevant institution."
Ah yes, the all Palestinians are Hamas argument again.
Israel once again denounced the decision on Tuesday. "Any decision and or action that improves the status of the Palestinians, either in the UN General Assembly or bilaterally, is currently a reward… for terrorism in general and the Hamas terrorists in particular," said Jonathan Miller, Israel's deputy ambassador to the UN.
Sorry, I meant, all Palestinians are terrorists.
How many more illegal settlements is Bezalel Smotrich going to create?
Smotrich recorded describing ‘mega-dramatic’ plan for civilian control over West Bank- Times of Israel
NYT report on recording says far-right minister told settlers that he’s acting in way so world ‘won’t say that we are doing annexation here,’ asserts Netanyahu is ‘with us full on’.
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was recently recorded telling settler supporters that the government is engaged in a clandestine effort to change the way Israel governs the West Bank, according to a report Friday that cited a recording of the far-right Religious Zionist party leader.
The New York Times said the recording was from an event held earlier in the month at which Smotrich, who is also a minister in the Defense Ministry, told supporters that the goal was to prevent the West Bank from becoming part of a Palestinian state.
“I’m telling you, it’s mega-dramatic,” Smotrich was quoted as saying. “Such changes change a system’s DNA.”
Sssh, iz secret, um, the hell it is.
Why did a British Jewish newspaper publish fake Israeli intelligence? +972 Magazine
Israel’s army suspects fabrications published in the Jewish Chronicle were part of a pro-Bibi influence campaign, while the article’s author is not as he claims
On Sept. 4, Benjamin Netanyahu called a press conference for foreign media in order to explain his stubborn insistence on keeping Israeli forces in Gaza’s Philadelphi Corridor, even at the expense of a hostage deal. To his well-worn claim that the Gaza-Egypt border has historically been “porous” to the smuggling of weapons, the prime minister attached a new argument: if the Israeli army is not in control of the area, Hamas could “easily smuggle hostages out … to the Sinai desert,” and from there to “Iran or … Yemen.” After that, he added, “they’re gone forever.”
The following day, the Jewish Chronicle, Britain’s oldest Jewish newspaper, published an exclusive report that brought Netanyahu’s hypothetical argument to life. It purported to reveal evidence from Israeli “intelligence sources” proving not only that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar intended to smuggle out the remaining hostages via the Philadelphi Corridor to Iran, but that Hamas’ surviving leaders in Gaza, including Sinwar himself, would be going with them.
The Jewish Chronicle’s scoop quickly gained traction and was picked up and amplified by a plethora of right-wing Israeli media outlets and influencers, including Netanyahu’s son Yair. On Sept. 9, the prime minister’s wife, Sara, met with the parents of remaining hostages and reportedly told them: “There is no choice with the Philadelphi Corridor — there are reports that [Hamas] will flee to Iran [with the hostages].”
There’s only one problem: the story is totally made up.
Oh dear.
Propaganda and “diplomacy” are mistaken for one another, again.
A Morning Muse
~A
