Last night, we hosted a li'l "Dinner and a Debate" shindig. Everyone in our house noticed a series of actions by the Presidon't that can only point to him being guided & aided DURING THE DEBATE.
Yes, that is correct. Kerry was not debating just the brain-dead Presidon't, but his top staff & attack dogs all at once.
First, every time he would write something down, it would usually be no more than just a few words. But as soon as he was done writing, he'd slide it to the right as if he was showing it to someone standing beside him. Obviously, NOONE was beside him, so that must mean that there was a camera somewhere over the podium focused on the Presidon'ts podium.
Next, he would look to the audience, and a few people in particular. If you re-watch the debate, you'll see he constantly looks at the same spot in the audience, and strains to focus his view in this same location.
It's obvious that he's receiving his guidance from this section of the audience by his reaction to the stare. Sometimes it was a chimpy grin, sometimes it was a nod, there was even a time or two where he actually mouthed words back - once, I recall, was "Love it".
Didn't anyone else notice this? Wouldn't this be a direct violation of the debate, and reinforce the weak & unstable Presidon't for the fraud he is?
Update [2004-10-1 12:43:37 by zeitshabba]: Okay - after a review discussion with another visitor last night, they made another great point. We would all expect the master debater Kerry to write down every response from the Presidon't, and prepare his rebuttal.
But what was the Presidon't writing to himself? What was so important that it could be summed up in just a few words? His debate plan wouldn't change based on anything Kerry could say, and we know he's not a quick thinker on his feet. So, for example, the benefit of him writing down "Vietnam", and nothing more, is nothing. That is, unless someone/anyone else, beside himself, would be able to see what he wrote while the debate was still ongoing.