What is more important? Trashing Kerry or Attacking Bush?

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Wednesday March 10, 2004 · 5:53 PM PST

2004/03/10 · 17:53

No matter who you supported in the primaries, no matter how much you do not like Kerry personally or because of his policies, no matter if you won't vote for Kerry, no matter if you will not vote at all, no matter if you will still write in Dean, no matter if you will vote for Nader, no matter if you will vote for Kerry, I have a question for all of you.

The Democratic Nominee is or presumptively will be John Forbes Kerry. The Republican Nominee is or presumptively will be George Walker Bush. And the Independent candidate will be Ralph Nader.

Thus, ask yourselves this: Who do you hate the most out of those three candidates. Who is the most dangerous candidate of those three? Who is more of a threat to my principles and ideals? I wager that the overwhelming answer to that question (save Brassmask because he will be happy if Bush wins because he hates Kerry so much) is that we all hate Bush the most.

Therefore, lets make a committment to fight together to topple Bush no matter if we vote for Nader, Kerry or not at all.

Let's attack Bush relentlessly. Let's respond to every attack that is thrown towards the Democrats. Lets reveal every lie that is told in this campaign. While I would prefer that everyone who hates Bush vote for Kerry so that we can guarantee that he is not "reelected," what is most important is that together reveal Bush for the scum that he is. Attacking Kerry does nothing to that end. Indeed, it weakens the unity of ABB and guarantees a victory for Bush. Attacking Kerry here does Rove's work for him.

Toppling Bush is the top priority. I think Nader and Kerry voters and simple Bush haters can agree on that.

This content was created by a Daily Kos Community member.

Make YOUR voice heard!

Comments are closed on this story.