Just before 4:00, this was a Congress Daily NEWS ALERT:
NEWS ALERT : HASTINGS OFFERS TO OPEN IMMEDIATE DELAY INVESTIGATION
House Ethics Chairman Hastings told reporters today that the Ethics panel would proceed immediately on an investigation of Majority Leader DeLay if Democrats on the panel approve two alterations to GOP-backed rules during a Thursday meeting of the full committee. "Let me emphasize that this is an unusual and extraordinary step for the committee to take," Hastings said in reference to the investigation, noting that the panel is empowered to self-initiate investigations. However, Democrats are unlikely to accept Hastings' offer, as Ethics ranking member Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va., is calling for a bipartisan taskforce to review the rules. Mollohan is scheduled to hold his own news conference at 4 p.m. to respond publicly to Hastings' offer.
So apparently they would rather "open immediate investigation of DeLay" than just revert to the old rules? A tad odd. And Hoyer just put out a release on the offer - he agrees:
Hoyer: Republican Proposal on Ethics Process Is Nothing But a Charade
Ethics Process Must be Based on Bipartisan Compromise, Not Personal Agreements Among Individuals
WASHINGTON, DC - House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement this afternoon regarding the proposal on ethics rules by the new Chairman of the Ethics Committee, Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA):
"This proposal on the ethics process by the Republican leadership is a charade and an absolute non-starter with Democrats, who reject it out of hand. It is a calculated attempt to divert attention from the fact that the Republican Majority has neutered the Ethics Committee in the House by imposing partisan rules that hamstring any meaningful inquiry, sacking the former Chairman and two other Republican Members of the Committee, and firing non-partisan professional staffers.
"While the American people are surely interested to see that Tom DeLay's fellow Republicans agree that his behavior demands investigation, this offer does not address the fact that Republicans are in a position to block other investigations on a party line vote. This issue is bigger than the Majority Leader, it is about the integrity of the entire House now and in the future.
"In addition, Rep. Hastings's personal assurances on ethics rules and practices - even if put in writing - cannot be the basis for resolving the Republican roadblock on the ethics process. The House ethics process should be based on bipartisan compromise that is supported by both parties, not on personal agreements between individuals that can be made irrelevant by a change of heart or chairmanship.
"The one true thing that this proposal demonstrates is that the Republican leadership is worried that the American people see right through its empty excuse for gutting the ethics process. They are starting to feel the heat for bypassing the Ethics Committee itself and revoking the bipartisan ethics rules that had served this institution and its Members well since 1997.
"The Democratic position on this issue is crystal clear: We should reinstate the bipartisan ethics rules as called for in the Mollohan-Hefley bill, or at the very least the Speaker ought to appoint a bipartisan task force to examine ethics rule changes and report back to the Members."
Basically the deal offered was this: they are willing to do just about anything, including immediately commencing an investigation of DeLay, as long as they can dismiss it with a party-line vote. Nice try.
UPDATE: Was DeLay behind the offer, or was Hastings courageously defying the beloved Leader? From the AP...
Hastings would not comment on whether he had spoken to DeLay about the proposal - but he did say he could not speak with a member "about matters that may or may not come before the ethics committee."
Nice try, Tom.