Really. I know I'm not very political and I'm not "in the know", so to speak, but do they always write misleading articles or are they supposed to be taken seriously? Is The Hill a propaganda print?
Because this is the second time Peter Savodnik wrote a misleading article, that I'm aware of, on Paul Hackett. The articles are in The Hill and I guess I sort of believed that it was a more independent, more factual publication. Am I wrong?
In case you couldn't guess, he misleads (distorts) the facts on Paul Hackett and paints a rosy picture (omits the true facts)for Mr. Brown.
Here we go again. I guess it just has to come from different sources, this type of slinging just can't seem to stop.