This morning I opened an account on Redstate.org, thiking that if I give them the oppurtunity to simply question archived facts (such as those so studiously archived by this site), they would at least take the oppurtunity to practise their own talking points. Of course, I was wrong. Despite what their rules say, my first post and my entire account was deleted hours later. Now, this doesn't bother me overmuch. I made a few errors. I decided that I would open with an impassioned argument, and then leave my own opinions out of it. Perhaps I should have stuck with just relaying the articles. My problem is that I'm not sure it would have mattered. What I'm interested in is the right wing response to information that discounts their own talking points (i.e. the Homeland Security website). Any advice on how to hammer just the facts, minus the editorial, at the hard right?