The death of Zarqawi and the formation of (another) Iraqi government
should have been the perfect moment for the administration to declare victory and begin winding down the war. Instead, we got vague assurances and equivication about the eventual outcome.
This makes perfect sense from Bush's point of view -- after all, why would the administration want to give back the absolute power it has seized in the name of fighting this war in the first place?
In the meantime, another grim milestone is passed: 2,500 US military killed.
OTOH, this is the perfect moment for the Democrats to offer a choice. They can pledge that the war will not be endless, the occupation will not be endless. It will end. The Democrats can pledge to do what needs to be done to end the war.
In acknowledging that, it will already have offered a clear choice versus the Republicans.
As for a specific plan, timing and benchmarks -- that is certainly debatable and should be open for discussion. Certainly that would be a meaningful discussion, unlike the useless debate that is occuring in the rubber stamp Republican Congress today.
In summary, the choice should be clear: one party will do what needs to be done to end the war, and the other will not.
Comments are closed on this story.