The link between male circumcision and HIV prevention was noted as long ago as the late 1980s. The first major clinical trial, of 3,000 men in South Africa, found last year that circumcision cut the HIV risk by 60 percent.
Still, many AIDS specialists had been awaiting the NIH's results as a final confirmation.
''Male circumcision can lower both an individual's risk of infection, and hopefully the rate of HIV spread through the community,'' said AIDS expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
But it's not perfect protection, Fauci stressed. Men who become circumcised must not quit using condoms nor take other risks -- and circumcision offers no protection from HIV acquired through anal sex or injection drug use, he noted.
''It's not a magic bullet, but a potentially important intervention,'' agreed Dr. Kevin De Cock of the World Health Organization.
Male circumcision is common at birth in the United States. But in sub-Saharan Africa, home to more than half of the world's almost 40 million HIV-infected people, there are large swaths of populations where male circumcision is rare.
Why am I posting this diary? There isn't much political about this story, or about circumcision. It is a simple medical procedure that I myself had done back when I was a baby.
But there are a certain group of Kossacks who have made it their life's work to not only inform us of the horrors of the procedure, but also to proclaim that there is a foreskin holocaust occurring every day around the world, and that we must do everything in our collective power to put an end to it!
As such, I am posting this diary to listen for the sounds of their heads exploding.
Comments are closed on this story.