David Yepsen, the Dean of the Iowa political press corps whose entire career has been made by his reporting of Iowa presidential politics, offers a solution to the question of who should go first. And surprisingly, he's willing to
sacrifice Iowa's lofty position to a more common sense solution:
The two parties should agree that the first state allowed to have a contest in the nomination process will be the closest one in the last presidential election. The second-closest state will get the second contest, etc.
That way both parties avoid process fights and are starting their campaigning - and their candidates are expending their greatest efforts - in those states likely to be the most competitive in November.
That's the simplest and best solution I've seen yet.
Comments are closed on this story.