Right now, in utter amazement, I'm watching CNBC objectively discuss social security privatization with 2 guests who supposedly have differing viewpoints.
One is from the Cato Institute.
One is from the Club for Growth.
Both of them are obviously in favor of Privatization, and are spreading falsehoods like the AARP is a liberal front group and Social Security will become insolvent in 2018 and there is no Social Security Trust Fund.
This is ridiculous.
If anybody would care to contact CNBC about this unbelievably hacktacular segment production, their e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Next time they objectively discuss Social Security Privatization, here's an idea, have guests on that represent both sides of the debate.
Is that too much to ask?