I'm on record many times, including in a diary on Friday, saying that I do not believe Shuster deserves to be fired over this. A temporary suspension is warranted, in my view, but because he does not have a history of this kind of thing, it does not constitute a firing offense. That does not, however, mean it's not worthy of coverage. How in the world is a reporter suggesting Chelsea is being "pimped out" not news, but Obama turning to talk to a colleague near Clinton is? I know a few print reporters have written about it, but that is nothing like 24/7 television, and we know it.
I love Gwen Ifill more every time I see her on something other than her PBS show (which is also good) because she's not afraid to speak truth to power. She is the ONLY person I've ever seen go on Russert's show and speak that-which-shall-not-be-named, whatever that might be for the week. During the Imus mess, she was the only one who said to Tim, "You've been awfully quiet about this incident yourself, Tim." And yesterday she was the only person in all the MSNBC and NBC coverage of the election over the weekend to dare say out loud: Shuster crossed a line and words matter.
We are all on different sides of this election, but I think we can agree the media proves itself again and again to be pitifully weak and hypocritical.
Comments are closed on this story.